head to head · open source

Uptime Kuma vs apm-agent-dotnet

Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars, 8,655 forks, 805 open issues and last shipped yesterday. apm-agent-dotnet has 594 stars, 219 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Uptime Kuma leads on adoption by 15,589% (93,190 vs 594 stars). Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript under MIT; apm-agent-dotnet is written in C# under Apache-2.0. Uptime Kuma has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, apm-agent-dotnet 37%. Uptime Kuma was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Uptime Kuma ★ 93K apm-agent-dotnet ★ 594 category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Uptime Kuma apm-agent-dotnet
GitHub stars ★ 93K ★ 594
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in JavaScript C#
Last push 2026-11-02 2026-11-01
Forks ⑂ 8.7K ⑂ 219
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Uptime Kuma if

  • You weight community size — 93K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Uptime Kuma profile →

pick apm-agent-dotnet if

  • You want the apm-agent-dotnet feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches C#
  • You evaluated both and apm-agent-dotnet fits your workflow better

full apm-agent-dotnet profile →

About Uptime Kuma

Uptime Kuma Uptime Kuma is an easy to use self hosted monitoring tool. 🥔 Live Demo Try it! Demo Server (Location: Frankfurt Germany): It is a temporary live demo, all data will be deleted after 10 minutes. Sponsored by Uptime Kuma Sponsors. ⭐ Features Monitoring uptime for HTTP(s) / TCP / HTTP(s) Keyword / HTTP(s) Json Query / Websocket / Ping / DNS Record / Push / Steam Game Server / Docker Containers Fancy, Reactive, Fast UI/UX Notifications via Telegram, Discord, Gotify, Slack, Pushover, Email (SMTP), and 90+ notification services, click here for the full list 20 second intervals Multi Languages Multiple…

read the full Uptime Kuma overview →

About apm-agent-dotnet

apm agent dotnet Please fill out this survey to help us prioritize framework support: Installation Official NuGet packages can be referenced from NuGet.org. Documentation Docs are located here. That page is generated from the content of the docs folder. Getting Help If you have any feedback feel free to open an issue. For any other assistance, please open or add to a topic on the APM discuss forum. If you need help or hit an issue, please start by opening a topic on our discuss forums. Please note that we reserve GitHub tickets for confirmed bugs and enhancement requests. Contributing See the contributing…

read the full apm-agent-dotnet overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Related comparisons

More Monitoring & Observability projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.

Frequently asked questions

Is Uptime Kuma or apm-agent-dotnet more popular?

Uptime Kuma has 93,190 GitHub stars and apm-agent-dotnet has 594. Uptime Kuma has the larger community by that measure.

Are Uptime Kuma and apm-agent-dotnet free?

Both are open source. Uptime Kuma is licensed under MIT and apm-agent-dotnet under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Uptime Kuma and apm-agent-dotnet?

Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript and apm-agent-dotnet in C#. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Uptime Kuma or apm-agent-dotnet?

Choose Uptime Kuma if you want the larger community (93,190 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose apm-agent-dotnet if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.