head to head · open source

copyparty vs uppy

copyparty has 46,739 GitHub stars, 1,905 forks, 252 open issues and last shipped yesterday. uppy has 30,989 stars, 2,103 forks, 186 open issues and last shipped yesterday. copyparty leads on adoption by 51% (46,739 vs 30,989 stars). copyparty is written in Python under MIT; uppy is written in TypeScript under MIT. copyparty has attracted 4% as many forks as stars, uppy 7%. copyparty was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

copyparty ★ 47K uppy ★ 31K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

copyparty uppy
GitHub stars ★ 47K ★ 31K
License MIT MIT
Written in Python TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-19 2026-09-19
Forks ⑂ 1.9K ⑂ 2.1K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick copyparty if

  • You weight community size — 47K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full copyparty profile →

pick uppy if

  • You want the uppy feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and uppy fits your workflow better

full uppy profile →

About copyparty

copyparty is a portable file server that turns almost any device into a file server with resumable uploads and downloads through any web browser, built for self hosters, homelab operators, NAS owners and anyone who wants to share files directly from their own hardware.

read the full copyparty overview →

About uppy

Uppy is an MIT licensed, TypeScript built, modular JavaScript file uploader for web browsers that drops into any web application, aimed at developers who would rather wire up plugins than build file uploading from scratch.

read the full uppy overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K OBS Studio ★ 76K

Related comparisons

localsend vs copyparty localsend vs uppy localsend vs rclone localsend vs files localsend vs yazi localsend vs spacedrive localsend vs nextcloud localsend vs cloudreve openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces

More File Management & Sync projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the File Management & Sync field.

copyparty vs LocalSend copyparty vs rclone copyparty vs Files copyparty vs yazi copyparty vs Spacedrive copyparty vs Nextcloud copyparty vs cloudreve copyparty vs superfile copyparty vs ranger copyparty vs Seafile copyparty vs PairDrop copyparty vs dufs

Frequently asked questions

Is copyparty or uppy more popular?

copyparty has 46,739 GitHub stars and uppy has 30,989. copyparty has the larger community by that measure.

Are copyparty and uppy free?

Both are open source. copyparty is licensed under MIT and uppy under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between copyparty and uppy?

copyparty is written in Python and uppy in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, copyparty or uppy?

Choose copyparty if you want the larger community (46,739 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose uppy if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.