head to head · open source
traefik vs smartdns
traefik has 65,442 GitHub stars, 6,318 forks, 939 open issues and last shipped yesterday. smartdns has 11,363 stars, 1,251 forks, 320 open issues and last shipped yesterday. traefik leads on adoption by 476% (65,442 vs 11,363 stars). traefik is written in Go under MIT; smartdns is written in C under GPL-3.0. traefik has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, smartdns 11%. smartdns was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| traefik | smartdns | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 65K | ★ 11K |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Written in | Go | C |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 6.3K | ⑂ 1.3K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick traefik if
- You weight community size — 65K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick smartdns if
- You want the smartdns feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches C
- You evaluated both and smartdns fits your workflow better
About traefik
Traefik (pronounced traffic ) is a modern HTTP reverse proxy and load balancer that makes deploying microservices easy. Traefik integrates with your existing infrastructure components (Docker, Swarm mode, Kubernetes, Consul, Etcd, Rancher v2, Amazon ECS, ...) and configures itself automatically and dynamically. Pointing Traefik at your orchestrator should be the only configuration step you need. . Overview . Features . Supported backends . Quickstart . Web UI . Documentation . . Support . Release cycle . Contributing . Maintainers . Credits . :warning: When migrating to a new major version of Traefik, please…
read the full traefik overview →
About smartdns
SmartDNS English SmartDNS 是一个运行在本地的 DNS 服务器，它接受来自本地客户端的 DNS 查询请求，然后从多个上游 DNS 服务器获取 DNS 查询结果，并将访问速度最快的结果返回给客户端，以此提高网络访问速度。 SmartDNS 同时支持指定特定域名 IP 地址，并高性匹配，可达到过滤广告的效果; 支持DOT，DOH，DOQ，DOH3，更好的保护隐私。 与 DNSmasq 的 all servers 不同，SmartDNS 返回的是访问速度最快的解析结果。 支持树莓派、OpenWrt、华硕路由器原生固件和 Windows 系统等。 使用指导 SmartDNS官网： 软件效果展示 仪表盘 速度对比 阿里 DNS 使用阿里 DNS 查询百度IP，并检测结果。 SmartDNS 使用 SmartDNS 查询百度 IP，并检测结果。 从对比看出，SmartDNS 找到了访问 www.baidu.com 最快的 IP 地址，比阿里 DNS 速度快了 5 倍。 特性 1. 多虚拟DNS服务器 支持多个虚拟DNS服务器，不同虚拟DNS服务器不同的端口，规则，客户端。 1. 多 DNS 上游服务器 支持配置多个上游 DNS 服务器，并同时进行查询，即使其中有 DNS 服务器异常，也不会影响查询。 1. 支持每个客户端独立控制 支持基于MAC，IP地址控制客户端使用不同查询规则，可实现家长控制等功能。…
read the full smartdns overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Networking & Connectivity projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Networking & Connectivity field.
Frequently asked questions
Is traefik or smartdns more popular?
traefik has 65,442 GitHub stars and smartdns has 11,363. traefik has the larger community by that measure.
Are traefik and smartdns free?
Both are open source. traefik is licensed under MIT and smartdns under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between traefik and smartdns?
traefik is written in Go and smartdns in C. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, traefik or smartdns?
Choose traefik if you want the larger community (65,442 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose smartdns if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.