head to head · open source

codegraph vs Tabby

codegraph has 71,385 GitHub stars, 4,590 forks, 518 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. Tabby has 33,884 stars, 1,789 forks, 335 open issues and last shipped 3 months ago. codegraph leads on adoption by 111% (71,385 vs 33,884 stars). codegraph is written in C under MIT; Tabby is written in Rust under a custom or non-standard licence. codegraph has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, Tabby 5%. codegraph was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

codegraph ★ 71K Tabby ★ 34K category Developer Tools

← all 13541 open source comparisons

Side by side

codegraph Tabby
GitHub stars ★ 71K ★ 34K
License MIT Custom / other
Written in C Rust
Last push 2026-09-16 2026-06-30
Forks ⑂ 4.6K ⑂ 1.8K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick codegraph if

  • You weight community size — 71K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches C
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full codegraph profile →

pick Tabby if

  • You want the Tabby feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You evaluated both and Tabby fits your workflow better

full Tabby profile →

About codegraph

CodeGraph is a pre indexed code knowledge graph that runs locally and wires into AI coding agents — Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, Gemini, OpenCode, AntiGravity, Kiro, GitHub Copilot, and Hermes Agent — so those agents query a semantic map of the codebase instead of reading files one at a time.

read the full codegraph overview →

About Tabby

Tabby is a self hosted, open source AI coding assistant that acts as an on premises alternative to GitHub Copilot, aimed at developers and engineering teams that want code completion and chat without routing source code through a third party cloud service.

read the full Tabby overview →

More in Developer Tools

react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 208K vscode ★ 193K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K pi ★ 107K

Related comparisons

openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip openclaw vs langflow n8n vs langflow langflow vs langchain langflow vs supabase n8n vs tooljet n8n vs appsmith n8n vs budibase langflow vs pocketbase openclaw vs harness supabase vs appwrite vite vs webpack vite vs appwrite vite vs parcel webpack vs appwrite vite vs harness vite vs dokku

More AI Assisted Coding projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Assisted Coding field.

codegraph vs OpenCode codegraph vs pi codegraph vs OpenHands codegraph vs Paperclip codegraph vs rtk codegraph vs Orca codegraph vs Cline codegraph vs Aider codegraph vs Continue codegraph vs Grok Build codegraph vs T3 Code codegraph vs Dyad

Frequently asked questions

Is codegraph or Tabby more popular?

codegraph has 71,385 GitHub stars and Tabby has 33,884. codegraph has the larger community by that measure.

Are codegraph and Tabby free?

Both are open source. codegraph is licensed under MIT, and Tabby has no licence declared in this registry. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between codegraph and Tabby?

codegraph is written in C and Tabby in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, codegraph or Tabby?

Choose codegraph if you want the larger community (71,385 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Tabby if its feature set, stack or Custom / other licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.