head to head · open source
rustfs vs storage
rustfs has 33,937 GitHub stars, 1,525 forks, 28 open issues and last shipped yesterday. storage has 1,327 stars, 308 forks, 66 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. rustfs leads on adoption by 2,457% (33,937 vs 1,327 stars). rustfs is written in Rust under Apache-2.0; storage is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0. rustfs has attracted 4% as many forks as stars, storage 23%. rustfs was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (object-storage, s3), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| rustfs | storage | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 34K | ★ 1.3K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | Rust | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-09-26 | 2026-09-25 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.5K | ⑂ 308 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick rustfs if
- You weight community size — 34K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Rust
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick storage if
- You want the storage feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and storage fits your workflow better
About rustfs
RustFS is an open source, S3 compatible, high performance distributed object storage system written in Rust, aimed at teams running data lakes, AI, and big data workloads who want MinIO style operational simplicity without the restrictions of an AGPL licence.
read the full rustfs overview →
About storage
Supabase Storage is a lightweight, S3 compatible object storage service written in TypeScript that keeps its metadata in Postgres, and it is built for teams that want object storage whose access rules are expressed as database policies rather than as a separate permission layer.
read the full storage overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Warehousing & Processing projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Warehousing & Processing field.
Frequently asked questions
Is rustfs or storage more popular?
rustfs has 33,937 GitHub stars and storage has 1,327. rustfs has the larger community by that measure.
Are rustfs and storage free?
Both are open source. rustfs is licensed under Apache-2.0 and storage under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between rustfs and storage?
rustfs is written in Rust and storage in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, rustfs or storage?
Choose rustfs if you want the larger community (33,937 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose storage if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.