head to head · open source
rustfs vs storage
rustfs has 35,980 GitHub stars, 1,659 forks, 28 open issues and last shipped yesterday. storage has 1,354 stars, 319 forks, 66 open issues and last shipped yesterday. rustfs leads on adoption by 2,557% (35,980 vs 1,354 stars). rustfs is written in Rust under Apache-2.0; storage is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0. rustfs has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, storage 24%. rustfs was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (object-storage, s3), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| rustfs | storage | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 36K | ★ 1.4K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | Rust | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-11 | 2026-11-11 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.7K | ⑂ 319 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick rustfs if
- You weight community size — 36K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Rust
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick storage if
- You want the storage feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and storage fits your workflow better
About rustfs
RustFS is a high performance, distributed object storage system built in Rust. Getting Started · Docs · Bug reports · Discussions English 简体中文 Deutsch Español français 日本語 한국어 Portuguese Русский RustFS is a high performance, distributed object storage system built in Rust—one of the most loved programming languages worldwide. RustFS combines the simplicity of MinIO with the memory safety and raw performance of Rust. It offers broad S3 API compatibility for supported features, is completely open source, and is optimized for data lakes, AI, and big data workloads. Unlike other storage systems, RustFS is released…
read the full rustfs overview →
About storage
Supabase Storage Engine A scalable, lightweight object storage service. Read this post on why we decided to build a new object storage service. Multi protocol support (HTTP, TUS, S3, Iceberg) Uses Postgres as its datastore for storing metadata Authorization rules are written as Postgres Row Level Security policies Integrates with S3 Compatible Storages Extremely lightweight and performant Supported Protocols [x] HTTP/REST [x] TUS Resumable Upload [x] S3 Compatible API [x] Iceberg REST Catalog Documentation OpenAPI Spec Storage Guides Client library Development Copy .env.sample to .env file. Copy .env.test.sample…
read the full storage overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Warehousing & Processing projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Warehousing & Processing field.
Frequently asked questions
Is rustfs or storage more popular?
rustfs has 35,980 GitHub stars and storage has 1,354. rustfs has the larger community by that measure.
Are rustfs and storage free?
Both are open source. rustfs is licensed under Apache-2.0 and storage under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between rustfs and storage?
rustfs is written in Rust and storage in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, rustfs or storage?
Choose rustfs if you want the larger community (35,980 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose storage if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.