head to head · open source

rustfs vs cubefs

rustfs has 33,388 GitHub stars, 1,497 forks, 28 open issues and last shipped today. cubefs has 5,660 stars, 714 forks, 265 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. rustfs leads on adoption by 490% (33,388 vs 5,660 stars). rustfs is written in Rust under Apache-2.0; cubefs is written in Go under Apache-2.0. rustfs has attracted 4% as many forks as stars, cubefs 13%. rustfs was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (object-storage), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

rustfs ★ 33K cubefs ★ 5.7K category Data & Analytics

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

rustfs cubefs
GitHub stars ★ 33K ★ 5.7K
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Rust Go
Last push 2026-09-20 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 1.5K ⑂ 714
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick rustfs if

  • You weight community size — 33K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full rustfs profile →

pick cubefs if

  • You want the cubefs feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and cubefs fits your workflow better

full cubefs profile →

About rustfs

RustFS is an open source, S3 compatible, high performance distributed object storage system written in Rust, aimed at teams running data lakes, AI, and big data workloads who want MinIO style operational simplicity without the restrictions of an AGPL licence.

read the full rustfs overview →

About cubefs

CubeFS is an Apache 2.0, CNCF graduated cloud native distributed file and object storage system written in Go, built for teams that need POSIX, HDFS, S3, and REST access to a single storage layer across datacenters, private and hybrid clouds, and Kubernetes.

read the full cubefs overview →

More in Data & Analytics

Mermaid ★ 90K Crawl4AI ★ 84K Scrapling ★ 82K Apache Superset ★ 75K echarts ★ 67K scrapy ★ 64K

Related comparisons

mermaid vs clickhouse crawl4ai vs clickhouse scrapling vs clickhouse apache-superset vs clickhouse mermaid vs apache-pinot clickhouse vs duckdb crawl4ai vs apache-pinot scrapling vs apache-pinot firecrawl vs scrapy firecrawl vs crawlee browser-use vs crawl4ai crawl4ai vs scrapling crawl4ai vs scrapy scrapling vs scrapy crawl4ai vs easyspider scrapling vs easyspider godot vs pixijs mermaid vs apache-superset supabase vs metabase mermaid vs echarts grafana vs apache-superset apache-superset vs echarts mermaid vs metabase mermaid vs pixijs

More Data Warehousing & Processing projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Warehousing & Processing field.

rustfs vs ClickHouse rustfs vs seaweedfs rustfs vs parse-server rustfs vs Apache Pinot rustfs vs dlt rustfs vs mountpoint-s3 rustfs vs hue rustfs vs bigquery-utils rustfs vs bigfunctions rustfs vs arc

Frequently asked questions

Is rustfs or cubefs more popular?

rustfs has 33,388 GitHub stars and cubefs has 5,660. rustfs has the larger community by that measure.

Are rustfs and cubefs free?

Both are open source. rustfs is licensed under Apache-2.0 and cubefs under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between rustfs and cubefs?

rustfs is written in Rust and cubefs in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, rustfs or cubefs?

Choose rustfs if you want the larger community (33,388 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose cubefs if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.