head to head · open source
rustfs vs Apache Pinot
rustfs has 33,108 GitHub stars, 1,482 forks, 28 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Apache Pinot has 6,139 stars, 1,509 forks, 1,403 open issues and last shipped yesterday. rustfs leads on adoption by 439% (33,108 vs 6,139 stars). rustfs is written in Rust under Apache-2.0; Apache Pinot is written in Java under Apache-2.0. rustfs has attracted 4% as many forks as stars, Apache Pinot 25%. rustfs was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 15422 open source comparisons
Side by side
| rustfs | Apache Pinot | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 33K | ★ 6.1K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | Rust | Java |
| Last push | 2026-09-18 | 2026-09-18 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.5K | ⑂ 1.5K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick rustfs if
- You weight community size — 33K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Rust
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Apache Pinot if
- You want the Apache Pinot feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Java
- You evaluated both and Apache Pinot fits your workflow better
About rustfs
RustFS is an open source, S3 compatible, high performance distributed object storage system written in Rust, aimed at teams running data lakes, AI, and big data workloads who want MinIO style operational simplicity without the restrictions of an AGPL licence.
read the full rustfs overview →
About Apache Pinot
Apache Pinot is a real time distributed OLAP datastore built to deliver scalable real time analytics at low latency. It lives in the Java ecosystem, is licensed under Apache 2.0, and was originally built by engineers at LinkedIn and Uber. The project ingests from batch data sources such as Hadoop HDFS, Amazon S3, Azure ADLS, and Google Cloud Storage, as well as from stream data sources such as Apache Kafka. It is designed to scale up and out with no upper bound, and its performance stays constant based on the size of the cluster and an expected query per second threshold.
read the full Apache Pinot overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Warehousing & Processing projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Warehousing & Processing field.
Frequently asked questions
Is rustfs or Apache Pinot more popular?
rustfs has 33,108 GitHub stars and Apache Pinot has 6,139. rustfs has the larger community by that measure.
Are rustfs and Apache Pinot free?
Both are open source. rustfs is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Apache Pinot under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between rustfs and Apache Pinot?
rustfs is written in Rust and Apache Pinot in Java. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, rustfs or Apache Pinot?
Choose rustfs if you want the larger community (33,108 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose Apache Pinot if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.