head to head · open source

rustfs vs lakeFS

rustfs has 33,528 GitHub stars, 1,502 forks, 28 open issues and last shipped yesterday. lakeFS has 5,535 stars, 477 forks, 443 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. rustfs leads on adoption by 506% (33,528 vs 5,535 stars). rustfs is written in Rust under Apache-2.0; lakeFS is written in Go under Apache-2.0. rustfs has attracted 4% as many forks as stars, lakeFS 9%. rustfs was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

rustfs ★ 34K lakeFS ★ 5.5K category Data & Analytics

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

rustfs lakeFS
GitHub stars ★ 34K ★ 5.5K
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Rust Go
Last push 2026-09-21 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 1.5K ⑂ 477
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick rustfs if

  • You weight community size — 34K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full rustfs profile →

pick lakeFS if

  • You want the lakeFS feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and lakeFS fits your workflow better

full lakeFS profile →

About rustfs

RustFS is an open source, S3 compatible, high performance distributed object storage system written in Rust, aimed at teams running data lakes, AI, and big data workloads who want MinIO style operational simplicity without the restrictions of an AGPL licence.

read the full rustfs overview →

About lakeFS

lakeFS is an open source data version control tool — commonly described as Git for data — that turns object storage into a versioned, Git like repository, and it is built for data engineers, analytics engineers, and data scientists who need repeatable, atomic, and auditable data lake operations.

read the full lakeFS overview →

More in Data & Analytics

Browser Use ★ 116K Mermaid ★ 90K Crawl4AI ★ 84K Scrapling ★ 83K Apache Superset ★ 75K echarts ★ 67K

Related comparisons

mermaid vs clickhouse crawl4ai vs clickhouse scrapling vs clickhouse apache-superset vs clickhouse mermaid vs apache-pinot clickhouse vs duckdb crawl4ai vs apache-pinot scrapling vs apache-pinot firecrawl vs scrapy firecrawl vs crawlee browser-use vs crawl4ai browser-use vs scrapling playwright vs crawl4ai browser-use vs scrapy playwright vs scrapling crawl4ai vs scrapling godot vs pixijs mermaid vs apache-superset three-js vs pixijs supabase vs metabase mermaid vs echarts grafana vs apache-superset apache-superset vs echarts mermaid vs metabase

More Data Warehousing & Processing projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Warehousing & Processing field.

rustfs vs ClickHouse rustfs vs seaweedfs rustfs vs parse-server rustfs vs Apache Pinot rustfs vs dlt rustfs vs mountpoint-s3 rustfs vs cubefs rustfs vs hue rustfs vs bigquery-utils rustfs vs bigfunctions rustfs vs arc

Frequently asked questions

Is rustfs or lakeFS more popular?

rustfs has 33,528 GitHub stars and lakeFS has 5,535. rustfs has the larger community by that measure.

Are rustfs and lakeFS free?

Both are open source. rustfs is licensed under Apache-2.0 and lakeFS under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between rustfs and lakeFS?

rustfs is written in Rust and lakeFS in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, rustfs or lakeFS?

Choose rustfs if you want the larger community (33,528 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose lakeFS if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.