head to head · open source

rustfs vs aistore

rustfs has 33,845 GitHub stars, 1,516 forks, 28 open issues and last shipped today. aistore has 1,938 stars, 284 forks, 5 open issues and last shipped yesterday. rustfs leads on adoption by 1,646% (33,845 vs 1,938 stars). rustfs is written in Rust under Apache-2.0; aistore is written in Go under MIT. rustfs has attracted 4% as many forks as stars, aistore 15%. rustfs was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (multi-cloud, object-storage), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

rustfs ★ 34K aistore ★ 1.9K category Data & Analytics

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

rustfs aistore
GitHub stars ★ 34K ★ 1.9K
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in Rust Go
Last push 2026-09-25 2026-09-24
Forks ⑂ 1.5K ⑂ 284
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick rustfs if

  • You weight community size — 34K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full rustfs profile →

pick aistore if

  • You want the aistore feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and aistore fits your workflow better

full aistore profile →

About rustfs

RustFS is an open source, S3 compatible, high performance distributed object storage system written in Rust, aimed at teams running data lakes, AI, and big data workloads who want MinIO style operational simplicity without the restrictions of an AGPL licence.

read the full rustfs overview →

About aistore

AIStore (AIS) is a lightweight, MIT licensed distributed object storage stack written in Go and tailored for AI workloads, intended for teams that need to keep training datasets and data transformation pipelines on their own Linux or Kubernetes infrastructure.

read the full aistore overview →

More in Data & Analytics

Browser Use ★ 116K Mermaid ★ 90K Crawl4AI ★ 84K Scrapling ★ 83K Apache Superset ★ 75K echarts ★ 67K

Related comparisons

mermaid vs clickhouse crawl4ai vs clickhouse scrapling vs clickhouse apache-superset vs clickhouse mermaid vs apache-pinot clickhouse vs duckdb crawl4ai vs apache-pinot scrapling vs apache-pinot firecrawl vs scrapy firecrawl vs crawlee browser-use vs crawl4ai browser-use vs scrapling playwright vs crawl4ai browser-use vs scrapy playwright vs scrapling crawl4ai vs scrapling godot vs pixijs mermaid vs apache-superset three-js vs pixijs supabase vs metabase mermaid vs echarts grafana vs apache-superset apache-superset vs echarts mermaid vs metabase

More Data Warehousing & Processing projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Warehousing & Processing field.

rustfs vs ClickHouse rustfs vs seaweedfs rustfs vs parse-server rustfs vs Apache Pinot rustfs vs dlt rustfs vs mountpoint-s3 rustfs vs cubefs rustfs vs lakeFS rustfs vs ZeroFS rustfs vs versitygw rustfs vs cloudserver rustfs vs hue

Frequently asked questions

Is rustfs or aistore more popular?

rustfs has 33,845 GitHub stars and aistore has 1,938. rustfs has the larger community by that measure.

Are rustfs and aistore free?

Both are open source. rustfs is licensed under Apache-2.0 and aistore under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between rustfs and aistore?

rustfs is written in Rust and aistore in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, rustfs or aistore?

Choose rustfs if you want the larger community (33,845 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose aistore if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.