head to head · open source

rustfs vs dlt

rustfs has 33,108 GitHub stars, 1,482 forks, 28 open issues and last shipped yesterday. dlt has 5,871 stars, 605 forks, 434 open issues and last shipped yesterday. rustfs leads on adoption by 464% (33,108 vs 5,871 stars). rustfs is written in Rust under Apache-2.0; dlt is written in Python under Apache-2.0. rustfs has attracted 4% as many forks as stars, dlt 10%. rustfs was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

rustfs ★ 33K dlt ★ 5.9K category Data & Analytics

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

rustfs dlt
GitHub stars ★ 33K ★ 5.9K
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Rust Python
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 1.5K ⑂ 605
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick rustfs if

  • You weight community size — 33K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full rustfs profile →

pick dlt if

  • You want the dlt feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and dlt fits your workflow better

full dlt profile →

About rustfs

RustFS is an open source, S3 compatible, high performance distributed object storage system written in Rust, aimed at teams running data lakes, AI, and big data workloads who want MinIO style operational simplicity without the restrictions of an AGPL licence.

read the full rustfs overview →

About dlt

dlt (data load tool) is an open source Python library, licensed under Apache 2.0, that automates tedious data loading by moving data from messy, often unstructured sources into well structured, typed datasets, and it is built for Python developers and data engineers who want to load data without adopting a platform.

read the full dlt overview →

More in Data & Analytics

Mermaid ★ 90K Crawl4AI ★ 84K Scrapling ★ 82K Apache Superset ★ 75K echarts ★ 67K scrapy ★ 64K

Related comparisons

mermaid vs clickhouse crawl4ai vs clickhouse scrapling vs clickhouse apache-superset vs clickhouse mermaid vs apache-pinot clickhouse vs duckdb crawl4ai vs apache-pinot scrapling vs apache-pinot firecrawl vs scrapy firecrawl vs crawlee browser-use vs crawl4ai crawl4ai vs scrapling crawl4ai vs scrapy scrapling vs scrapy crawl4ai vs easyspider scrapling vs easyspider godot vs pixijs mermaid vs apache-superset supabase vs metabase mermaid vs echarts grafana vs apache-superset apache-superset vs echarts mermaid vs metabase mermaid vs pixijs

More Data Warehousing & Processing projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Warehousing & Processing field.

rustfs vs ClickHouse rustfs vs seaweedfs rustfs vs parse-server rustfs vs Apache Pinot rustfs vs hue rustfs vs bigquery-utils rustfs vs arc

Frequently asked questions

Is rustfs or dlt more popular?

rustfs has 33,108 GitHub stars and dlt has 5,871. rustfs has the larger community by that measure.

Are rustfs and dlt free?

Both are open source. rustfs is licensed under Apache-2.0 and dlt under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between rustfs and dlt?

rustfs is written in Rust and dlt in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, rustfs or dlt?

Choose rustfs if you want the larger community (33,108 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose dlt if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.