head to head · open source

rustfs vs versitygw

rustfs has 33,675 GitHub stars, 1,509 forks, 28 open issues and last shipped today. versitygw has 2,933 stars, 310 forks, 154 open issues and last shipped yesterday. rustfs leads on adoption by 1,048% (33,675 vs 2,933 stars). rustfs is written in Rust under Apache-2.0; versitygw is written in Go under Apache-2.0. rustfs has attracted 4% as many forks as stars, versitygw 11%. rustfs was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 3 topic tags (filesystem, object-storage, s3), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

rustfs ★ 34K versitygw ★ 2.9K category Data & Analytics

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

rustfs versitygw
GitHub stars ★ 34K ★ 2.9K
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Rust Go
Last push 2026-09-23 2026-09-22
Forks ⑂ 1.5K ⑂ 310
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick rustfs if

  • You weight community size — 34K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full rustfs profile →

pick versitygw if

  • You want the versitygw feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and versitygw fits your workflow better

full versitygw profile →

About rustfs

RustFS is an open source, S3 compatible, high performance distributed object storage system written in Rust, aimed at teams running data lakes, AI, and big data workloads who want MinIO style operational simplicity without the restrictions of an AGPL licence.

read the full rustfs overview →

About versitygw

VersityGW (the Versity S3 Gateway) is an Apache 2.0 licensed, Go based translation service that presents existing storage — a generic POSIX filesystem, Versity's open source ScoutFS, Azure Blob Storage, or another S3 server — through a standard S3 API, and it is aimed at teams that already run storage infrastructure and want S3 compatible access to it without migrating data into a separate object store.

read the full versitygw overview →

More in Data & Analytics

Browser Use ★ 116K Mermaid ★ 90K Crawl4AI ★ 84K Scrapling ★ 83K Apache Superset ★ 75K echarts ★ 67K

Related comparisons

mermaid vs clickhouse crawl4ai vs clickhouse scrapling vs clickhouse apache-superset vs clickhouse mermaid vs apache-pinot clickhouse vs duckdb crawl4ai vs apache-pinot scrapling vs apache-pinot firecrawl vs scrapy firecrawl vs crawlee browser-use vs crawl4ai browser-use vs scrapling playwright vs crawl4ai browser-use vs scrapy playwright vs scrapling crawl4ai vs scrapling godot vs pixijs mermaid vs apache-superset three-js vs pixijs supabase vs metabase mermaid vs echarts grafana vs apache-superset apache-superset vs echarts mermaid vs metabase

More Data Warehousing & Processing projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Warehousing & Processing field.

rustfs vs ClickHouse rustfs vs seaweedfs rustfs vs parse-server rustfs vs Apache Pinot rustfs vs dlt rustfs vs mountpoint-s3 rustfs vs cubefs rustfs vs lakeFS rustfs vs ZeroFS rustfs vs hue rustfs vs bigquery-utils rustfs vs bigfunctions

Frequently asked questions

Is rustfs or versitygw more popular?

rustfs has 33,675 GitHub stars and versitygw has 2,933. rustfs has the larger community by that measure.

Are rustfs and versitygw free?

Both are open source. rustfs is licensed under Apache-2.0 and versitygw under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between rustfs and versitygw?

rustfs is written in Rust and versitygw in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, rustfs or versitygw?

Choose rustfs if you want the larger community (33,675 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose versitygw if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.