head to head · open source
Gitea vs reviewdog
Gitea has 58,080 GitHub stars, 7,157 forks, 2,455 open issues and last shipped today. reviewdog has 9,601 stars, 495 forks, 131 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Gitea leads on adoption by 505% (58,080 vs 9,601 stars). Gitea is written in Go under MIT; reviewdog is written in Go under MIT. Gitea has attracted 12% as many forks as stars, reviewdog 5%. Gitea was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 3 topic tags (bitbucket, github, gitlab), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Gitea | reviewdog | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 58K | ★ 9.6K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | Go | Go |
| Last push | 2026-09-20 | 2026-09-19 |
| Forks | ⑂ 7.2K | ⑂ 495 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Gitea if
- You weight community size — 58K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick reviewdog if
- You want the reviewdog feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and reviewdog fits your workflow better
About Gitea
Gitea is a self hosted, all in one software development service written in Go. It provides Git hosting, code review, issue tracking, project management (kanban), wiki, team collaboration, package registry, and CI/CD capabilities. The project aims to deliver a lightweight, painless alternative to larger platforms by running as a single binary across Linux, macOS, FreeBSD, OpenBSD, and Windows on multiple architectures.
read the full Gitea overview →
About reviewdog
reviewdog is an automated code review tool written in Go and released under the MIT license. It lives in the version control and collaboration space of the developer tooling ecosystem, and it integrates with code analysis tools regardless of programming language. Rather than performing analysis itself, reviewdog consumes the output of existing linters and static analysis tools and turns those findings into review comments on code hosting services. The project has been published for roughly ten years, carries more than nine thousand stars and close to five hundred forks, and its topic list covers CI, linting, stat…
read the full reviewdog overview →
More in Developer Tools
Related comparisons
More Version Control & Collaboration projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Version Control & Collaboration field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Gitea or reviewdog more popular?
Gitea has 58,080 GitHub stars and reviewdog has 9,601. Gitea has the larger community by that measure.
Are Gitea and reviewdog free?
Both are open source. Gitea is licensed under MIT and reviewdog under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Gitea and reviewdog?
Gitea is written in Go and reviewdog in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Gitea or reviewdog?
Choose Gitea if you want the larger community (58,080 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose reviewdog if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.