head to head · open source
copyparty vs PasswordPusher
copyparty has 47,328 GitHub stars, 1,924 forks, 252 open issues and last shipped 22 days ago. PasswordPusher has 3,247 stars, 477 forks, 105 open issues and last shipped yesterday. copyparty leads on adoption by 1,358% (47,328 vs 3,247 stars). copyparty is written in Python under MIT; PasswordPusher is written in Ruby under Apache-2.0. copyparty has attracted 4% as many forks as stars, PasswordPusher 15%. PasswordPusher was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (file-sharing), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| copyparty | PasswordPusher | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 47K | ★ 3.2K |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | Python | Ruby |
| Last push | 2026-10-21 | 2026-11-11 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.9K | ⑂ 477 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick copyparty if
- You weight community size — 47K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick PasswordPusher if
- You want the PasswordPusher feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Ruby
- You evaluated both and PasswordPusher fits your workflow better
About copyparty
💾🎉 copyparty turn almost any device into a file server with resumable uploads/downloads using any web browser server only needs Python (2 or 3), all dependencies optional 🔌 protocols: http(s) // webdav // sftp // ftp(s) // tftp // smb/cifs 📱 android app // iPhone shortcuts 👉 Get started! or visit the read only demo server 👀 running on a nuc in my basement 📷 screenshots: browser // upload // unpost // thumbnails // search // fsearch // zip DL // md viewer 🎬 videos: upload // cli upload // race the beam // 👉 feature showcase (youtube) built in Norway 🇳🇴 with contributions from not norway readme toc top…
read the full copyparty overview →
About PasswordPusher
Share passwords, text, files & URLs securely with self deleting links and full audit logs. v2.0 is released. If you already self host, see the upgrade guide for migration notes and configuration changes. What is Password Pusher? Password Pusher is an open source web app for sharing sensitive information safely. You push a password, note, file, or URL; the recipient gets a one time link that expires after a set number of views and/or time. No more sending secrets over chat or email—encrypted, auditable, and auto self destruct. Use the hosted service or run your own instance with Docker in minutes. Why Password…
read the full PasswordPusher overview →
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More File Management & Sync projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the File Management & Sync field.
Frequently asked questions
Is copyparty or PasswordPusher more popular?
copyparty has 47,328 GitHub stars and PasswordPusher has 3,247. copyparty has the larger community by that measure.
Are copyparty and PasswordPusher free?
Both are open source. copyparty is licensed under MIT and PasswordPusher under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between copyparty and PasswordPusher?
copyparty is written in Python and PasswordPusher in Ruby. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, copyparty or PasswordPusher?
Choose copyparty if you want the larger community (47,328 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose PasswordPusher if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.