head to head · open source
copyparty vs PasswordPusher
copyparty has 46,802 GitHub stars, 1,904 forks, 252 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. PasswordPusher has 3,202 stars, 460 forks, 105 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. copyparty leads on adoption by 1,362% (46,802 vs 3,202 stars). copyparty is written in Python under MIT; PasswordPusher is written in Ruby under Apache-2.0. copyparty has attracted 4% as many forks as stars, PasswordPusher 14%. PasswordPusher was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (file-sharing), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| copyparty | PasswordPusher | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 47K | ★ 3.2K |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | Python | Ruby |
| Last push | 2026-09-24 | 2026-09-25 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.9K | ⑂ 460 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick copyparty if
- You weight community size — 47K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick PasswordPusher if
- You want the PasswordPusher feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Ruby
- You evaluated both and PasswordPusher fits your workflow better
About copyparty
copyparty is a portable file server that turns almost any device into a file server with resumable uploads and downloads through any web browser, built for self hosters, homelab operators, NAS owners and anyone who wants to share files directly from their own hardware.
read the full copyparty overview →
About PasswordPusher
PasswordPusher is an Apache 2.0 licensed Ruby web application for sharing passwords, notes, files and URLs as self deleting links that expire after a set number of views or a set duration, with audit logs recording who viewed what, and when.
read the full PasswordPusher overview →
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More File Management & Sync projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the File Management & Sync field.
Frequently asked questions
Is copyparty or PasswordPusher more popular?
copyparty has 46,802 GitHub stars and PasswordPusher has 3,202. copyparty has the larger community by that measure.
Are copyparty and PasswordPusher free?
Both are open source. copyparty is licensed under MIT and PasswordPusher under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between copyparty and PasswordPusher?
copyparty is written in Python and PasswordPusher in Ruby. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, copyparty or PasswordPusher?
Choose copyparty if you want the larger community (46,802 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose PasswordPusher if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.