head to head · open source

open-design vs two.js

open-design has 98,528 GitHub stars, 11,424 forks, 1,090 open issues and last shipped today. two.js has 8,662 stars, 463 forks, 42 open issues and last shipped today. open-design leads on adoption by 1,037% (98,528 vs 8,662 stars). open-design is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0; two.js is written in JavaScript under MIT. open-design has attracted 12% as many forks as stars, two.js 5%. open-design was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

open-design ★ 99K two.js ★ 8.7K category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

open-design two.js
GitHub stars ★ 99K ★ 8.7K
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in TypeScript JavaScript
Last push 2026-09-29 2026-09-29
Forks ⑂ 11K ⑂ 463
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick open-design if

  • You weight community size — 99K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full open-design profile →

pick two.js if

  • You want the two.js feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and two.js fits your workflow better

full two.js profile →

About open-design

OpenDesign is an open source, local first desktop design application for macOS and Windows that turns the coding agent already installed on a developer's machine into the design engine, producing prototypes, dashboards, decks, images, and motion graphics as real files exported to HTML, PDF, PPTX, and MP4.

read the full open-design overview →

About two.js

Two.js is a renderer agnostic two dimensional drawing API for the web, published as the npm package two.js under the MIT licence, for JavaScript developers who want one API to draw and animate the same scene in WebGL, Canvas2D, or SVG.

read the full two.js overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 186K Godot ★ 118K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K manim ★ 94K Home Assistant ★ 91K

Related comparisons

ant-design vs open-design open-design vs manim open-design vs fleetbase ant-design vs manim firecrawl vs openpencil firecrawl vs draw-io firecrawl vs plasmic firecrawl vs quant-ux firecrawl vs grida firecrawl vs godot godot vs three-js firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame godot vs imgui three-js vs imgui firecrawl vs sbox godot vs bevy firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap firecrawl vs openseo

More Design & Prototyping projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Design & Prototyping field.

open-design vs ant-design open-design vs manim open-design vs anime open-design vs hyperframes open-design vs daisyui open-design vs tabler open-design vs motion open-design vs layui open-design vs lottie-ios open-design vs vant open-design vs primitives open-design vs mojs

Frequently asked questions

Is open-design or two.js more popular?

open-design has 98,528 GitHub stars and two.js has 8,662. open-design has the larger community by that measure.

Are open-design and two.js free?

Both are open source. open-design is licensed under Apache-2.0 and two.js under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between open-design and two.js?

open-design is written in TypeScript and two.js in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, open-design or two.js?

Choose open-design if you want the larger community (98,528 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose two.js if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.