head to head · open source

open-design vs Pow

open-design has 99,461 GitHub stars, 11,505 forks, 1,090 open issues and last shipped today. Pow has 4,411 stars, 200 forks, 20 open issues and last shipped 6 months ago. open-design leads on adoption by 2,155% (99,461 vs 4,411 stars). open-design is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0; Pow is written in Swift under MIT. open-design has attracted 12% as many forks as stars, Pow 5%. open-design was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

open-design ★ 99K Pow ★ 4.4K category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

open-design Pow
GitHub stars ★ 99K ★ 4.4K
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in TypeScript Swift
Last push 2026-10-05 2026-04-13
Forks ⑂ 12K ⑂ 200
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick open-design if

  • You weight community size — 99K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full open-design profile →

pick Pow if

  • You want the Pow feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Swift
  • You evaluated both and Pow fits your workflow better

full Pow profile →

About open-design

OpenDesign is an open source, local first desktop design application for macOS and Windows that turns the coding agent already installed on a developer's machine into the design engine, producing prototypes, dashboards, decks, images, and motion graphics as real files exported to HTML, PDF, PPTX, and MP4.

read the full open-design overview →

About Pow

Pow is an open source Swift package of SwiftUI transitions and value change effects for iOS, macOS, Mac Catalyst and visionOS developers who want polished animation and haptics without writing them by hand.

read the full Pow overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 189K Godot ★ 118K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K manim ★ 95K OpenCut ★ 92K

Related comparisons

ant-design vs open-design open-design vs manim open-design vs fleetbase ant-design vs manim firecrawl vs openpencil firecrawl vs draw-io firecrawl vs plasmic firecrawl vs quant-ux firecrawl vs grida firecrawl vs godot godot vs three-js firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame godot vs imgui three-js vs imgui firecrawl vs sbox godot vs bevy firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap firecrawl vs openseo

More Design & Prototyping projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Design & Prototyping field.

open-design vs ant-design open-design vs manim open-design vs anime open-design vs hyperframes open-design vs daisyui open-design vs tabler open-design vs motion open-design vs layui open-design vs lottie-ios open-design vs vant open-design vs primitives open-design vs mojs

Frequently asked questions

Is open-design or Pow more popular?

open-design has 99,461 GitHub stars and Pow has 4,411. open-design has the larger community by that measure.

Are open-design and Pow free?

Both are open source. open-design is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Pow under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between open-design and Pow?

open-design is written in TypeScript and Pow in Swift. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, open-design or Pow?

Choose open-design if you want the larger community (99,461 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose Pow if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.