head to head · open source
open-design vs open-design-agent-kit
open-design has 106,292 GitHub stars, 12,100 forks, 1,090 open issues and last shipped yesterday. open-design-agent-kit has 1,029 stars, 99 forks, 8 open issues and last shipped yesterday. open-design leads on adoption by 10,230% (106,292 vs 1,029 stars). open-design is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0; open-design-agent-kit is written in HTML under MIT. open-design has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, open-design-agent-kit 10%. open-design was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 4 topic tags (agent-skills, ai-design, claude-design, design-systems), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| open-design | open-design-agent-kit | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 106K | ★ 1.0K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | HTML |
| Last push | 2026-11-06 | 2026-11-06 |
| Forks | ⑂ 12K | ⑂ 99 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick open-design if
- You weight community size — 106K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick open-design-agent-kit if
- You want the open-design-agent-kit feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches HTML
- You evaluated both and open-design-agent-kit fits your workflow better
About open-design
OpenDesign: The open source Claude Design alternative ⚡ OpenDesign Cloud — the official model service. One recharge to use both agent and image models inside OpenDesign: GPT, Claude, and DeepSeek for agents; GPT Image 2.0, Seedream 5.0 Pro, and Nano Banana 2.0 for images. 🚀 DeepSeek V4 Flash and V4 Pro are now available. Put top tier intelligence to work across prototypes, decks, design systems, and everyday agent tasks. OpenDesign members can use both models without limits for two weeks, directly inside the app. 🧩 DeepSeek Harness is now supported. Connect DeepSeek's official dsh agent harness to OpenDesign…
read the full open-design overview →
About open-design-agent-kit
Open Design Agent Kit English 简体中文 日本語 Pro grade design, built right into the coding agent you already use. Open Design Agent Kit brings Open Design's design skills, brand design systems, and remixable examples into GitHub Copilot Chat, Claude Code, Codex, Cursor , and any other MCP capable agent. Ask for a pitch deck, landing page, dashboard, or mobile prototype in the chat you already have open. Your agent's own model builds it with its own file tools, guided by a library that keeps the result from looking AI generated. No desktop app. No daemon. No extra account, API key, or model settings. Install it, ask…
read the full open-design-agent-kit overview →
More in Miscellaneous
Related comparisons
More Design & Prototyping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Design & Prototyping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is open-design or open-design-agent-kit more popular?
open-design has 106,292 GitHub stars and open-design-agent-kit has 1,029. open-design has the larger community by that measure.
Are open-design and open-design-agent-kit free?
Both are open source. open-design is licensed under Apache-2.0 and open-design-agent-kit under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between open-design and open-design-agent-kit?
open-design is written in TypeScript and open-design-agent-kit in HTML. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, open-design or open-design-agent-kit?
Choose open-design if you want the larger community (106,292 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose open-design-agent-kit if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.