head to head · open source

open-design vs motion-primitives

open-design has 99,174 GitHub stars, 11,464 forks, 1,090 open issues and last shipped yesterday. motion-primitives has 6,449 stars, 269 forks, 35 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. open-design leads on adoption by 1,438% (99,174 vs 6,449 stars). open-design is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0; motion-primitives is written in TypeScript under MIT. open-design has attracted 12% as many forks as stars, motion-primitives 4%. open-design was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

open-design ★ 99K motion-primitives ★ 6.4K category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

open-design motion-primitives
GitHub stars ★ 99K ★ 6.4K
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in TypeScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-10-02 2026-09-28
Forks ⑂ 11K ⑂ 269
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick open-design if

  • You weight community size — 99K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full open-design profile →

pick motion-primitives if

  • You want the motion-primitives feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and motion-primitives fits your workflow better

full motion-primitives profile →

About open-design

OpenDesign is an open source, local first desktop design application for macOS and Windows that turns the coding agent already installed on a developer's machine into the design engine, producing prototypes, dashboards, decks, images, and motion graphics as real files exported to HTML, PDF, PPTX, and MP4.

read the full open-design overview →

About motion-primitives

Motion Primitives is an open source, MIT licensed UI kit of animated interface components for engineers and designers working with TypeScript, Tailwind CSS, and motion.

read the full motion-primitives overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 188K Godot ★ 118K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K manim ★ 94K Home Assistant ★ 91K

Related comparisons

ant-design vs open-design open-design vs manim open-design vs fleetbase ant-design vs manim firecrawl vs openpencil firecrawl vs draw-io firecrawl vs plasmic firecrawl vs quant-ux firecrawl vs grida firecrawl vs godot godot vs three-js firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame godot vs imgui three-js vs imgui firecrawl vs sbox godot vs bevy firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap firecrawl vs openseo

More Design & Prototyping projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Design & Prototyping field.

open-design vs ant-design open-design vs manim open-design vs anime open-design vs hyperframes open-design vs daisyui open-design vs tabler open-design vs motion open-design vs layui open-design vs lottie-ios open-design vs vant open-design vs primitives open-design vs mojs

Frequently asked questions

Is open-design or motion-primitives more popular?

open-design has 99,174 GitHub stars and motion-primitives has 6,449. open-design has the larger community by that measure.

Are open-design and motion-primitives free?

Both are open source. open-design is licensed under Apache-2.0 and motion-primitives under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between open-design and motion-primitives?

open-design is written in TypeScript and motion-primitives in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, open-design or motion-primitives?

Choose open-design if you want the larger community (99,174 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose motion-primitives if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.