head to head · open source
open-design vs m3e-canvas
open-design has 105,526 GitHub stars, 12,030 forks, 1,090 open issues and last shipped yesterday. m3e-canvas has 9,998 stars, 1,106 forks, 8 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. open-design leads on adoption by 955% (105,526 vs 9,998 stars). open-design is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0; m3e-canvas is written in TypeScript under MIT. open-design has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, m3e-canvas 11%. open-design was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| open-design | m3e-canvas | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 106K | ★ 10.0K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-01 |
| Forks | ⑂ 12K | ⑂ 1.1K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick open-design if
- You weight community size — 106K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick m3e-canvas if
- You want the m3e-canvas feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and m3e-canvas fits your workflow better
About open-design
OpenDesign: The open source Claude Design alternative ⚡ OpenDesign Cloud — the official model service. One recharge to use both agent and image models inside OpenDesign: GPT, Claude, and DeepSeek for agents; GPT Image 2.0, Seedream 5.0 Pro, and Nano Banana 2.0 for images. 🚀 DeepSeek V4 Flash and V4 Pro are now available. Put top tier intelligence to work across prototypes, decks, design systems, and everyday agent tasks. OpenDesign members can use both models without limits for two weeks, directly inside the app. 🧩 DeepSeek Harness is now supported. Connect DeepSeek's official dsh agent harness to OpenDesign…
read the full open-design overview →
About m3e-canvas
M3E Canvas Sketch Material 3 Expressive screens in the browser, link them, tap through them, and copy a prompt for your AI coding tool. 日本語 · 中文 · 한국어 · Open the app Sketch a recipes app, retheme it, copy the prompt, hand it to an AI coding tool, and run the result on Android. ( mp4 ) Works with any AI coding tool that takes a prompt, such as Claude Code, Codex, Gemini CLI or Cursor: copy the prompt, paste it into the tool, and ask for the app. What it does Drag and drop parts – buttons, icon buttons, FABs, split buttons, FAB menus, chips, app bars, navigation bars, floating toolbars, tabs, search bars, cards…
read the full m3e-canvas overview →
More in Miscellaneous
Related comparisons
More Design & Prototyping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Design & Prototyping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is open-design or m3e-canvas more popular?
open-design has 105,526 GitHub stars and m3e-canvas has 9,998. open-design has the larger community by that measure.
Are open-design and m3e-canvas free?
Both are open source. open-design is licensed under Apache-2.0 and m3e-canvas under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between open-design and m3e-canvas?
open-design is written in TypeScript and m3e-canvas in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, open-design or m3e-canvas?
Choose open-design if you want the larger community (105,526 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose m3e-canvas if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.