head to head · open source
open-design vs Gum
open-design has 96,970 GitHub stars, 11,267 forks, 1,090 open issues and last shipped today. Gum has 620 stars, 81 forks, 20 open issues and last shipped today. open-design leads on adoption by 15,540% (96,970 vs 620 stars). open-design is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0; Gum is written in C# under MIT. open-design has attracted 12% as many forks as stars, Gum 13%. Gum was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 15422 open source comparisons
Side by side
| open-design | Gum | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 97K | ★ 620 |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | C# |
| Last push | 2026-09-19 | 2026-09-19 |
| Forks | ⑂ 11K | ⑂ 81 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick open-design if
- You weight community size — 97K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Gum if
- You want the Gum feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches C#
- You evaluated both and Gum fits your workflow better
About open-design
OpenDesign is an open source, local first desktop design application for macOS and Windows that turns the coding agent already installed on a developer's machine into the design engine, producing prototypes, dashboards, decks, images, and motion graphics as real files exported to HTML, PDF, PPTX, and MP4.
read the full open-design overview →
About Gum
Gum is an MIT licensed C UI layout tool built on object oriented principles, distributed as NuGet runtimes for MonoGame, KNI, raylib, SkiaSharp, MAUI and FNA, and intended for developers who need one flexible, inheritance driven layout system across game engines and .NET platforms.
More in Miscellaneous
Related comparisons
More Design & Prototyping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Design & Prototyping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is open-design or Gum more popular?
open-design has 96,970 GitHub stars and Gum has 620. open-design has the larger community by that measure.
Are open-design and Gum free?
Both are open source. open-design is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Gum under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between open-design and Gum?
open-design is written in TypeScript and Gum in C#. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, open-design or Gum?
Choose open-design if you want the larger community (96,970 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose Gum if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.