head to head · open source

NetData vs s-tui

NetData has 80,564 GitHub stars, 6,630 forks, 393 open issues and last shipped today. s-tui has 5,093 stars, 181 forks, 39 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. NetData leads on adoption by 1,482% (80,564 vs 5,093 stars). NetData is written in Go under GPL-3.0; s-tui is written in Python under GPL-2.0. NetData has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, s-tui 4%. NetData was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

NetData ★ 81K s-tui ★ 5.1K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

NetData s-tui
GitHub stars ★ 81K ★ 5.1K
License GPL-3.0 GPL-2.0
Written in Go Python
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-15
Forks ⑂ 6.6K ⑂ 181
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick NetData if

  • You weight community size — 81K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full NetData profile →

pick s-tui if

  • You want the s-tui feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and s-tui fits your workflow better

full s-tui profile →

About NetData

Netdata is an open source, real time infrastructure monitoring platform written in Go and released under GPL 3.0, built for operators and lean teams who need per second visibility across Linux, macOS, FreeBSD, and Windows systems.

read the full NetData overview →

About s-tui

s tui is a terminal based CPU stress and monitoring utility, written in Python and released under the GPL 2.0 licence, that renders CPU temperature, frequency, power and utilization as live graphs for anyone who needs to inspect or load a Linux machine from a text console or an SSH session.

read the full s-tui overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K Elasticsearch ★ 78K Grafana ★ 77K

Related comparisons

uptime-kuma vs netdata worldmonitor vs netdata netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph mall vs prometheus mall vs nocodb mall vs etcd mall vs dbeaver mall vs orm prometheus vs nocodb mall vs milvus mall vs tidb

More Monitoring & Observability projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.

NetData vs Uptime Kuma NetData vs worldmonitor NetData vs Grafana NetData vs huginn NetData vs Sentry NetData vs SigNoz NetData vs Grafana Loki NetData vs beszel NetData vs cilium NetData vs Apache SkyWalking NetData vs jaeger NetData vs Vector

Frequently asked questions

Is NetData or s-tui more popular?

NetData has 80,564 GitHub stars and s-tui has 5,093. NetData has the larger community by that measure.

Are NetData and s-tui free?

Both are open source. NetData is licensed under GPL-3.0 and s-tui under GPL-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between NetData and s-tui?

NetData is written in Go and s-tui in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, NetData or s-tui?

Choose NetData if you want the larger community (80,564 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose s-tui if its feature set, stack or GPL-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.