head to head · open source

NetData vs huginn

NetData has 80,561 GitHub stars, 6,630 forks, 393 open issues and last shipped yesterday. huginn has 49,967 stars, 4,298 forks, 698 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. NetData leads on adoption by 61% (80,561 vs 49,967 stars). NetData is written in Go under GPL-3.0; huginn is written in Ruby under MIT. NetData has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, huginn 9%. NetData was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

NetData ★ 81K huginn ★ 50K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

NetData huginn
GitHub stars ★ 81K ★ 50K
License GPL-3.0 MIT
Written in Go Ruby
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-16
Forks ⑂ 6.6K ⑂ 4.3K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick NetData if

  • You weight community size — 81K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full NetData profile →

pick huginn if

  • You want the huginn feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Ruby
  • You evaluated both and huginn fits your workflow better

full huginn profile →

About NetData

Netdata is an open source, real time infrastructure monitoring platform written in Go and released under GPL 3.0, built for operators and lean teams who need per second visibility across Linux, macOS, FreeBSD, and Windows systems.

read the full NetData overview →

About huginn

Huginn is an open source system for building agents that perform automated tasks online, written in Ruby and released under the MIT license. Its agents read the web, watch for events, and take actions on the user's behalf. Internally, agents create and consume events that propagate along a directed graph, which means one agent's output becomes another agent's input and a chain of small steps can be composed into a larger workflow. The project lives in the Ruby ecosystem and is distributed as an official Docker image or installed locally from a forked repository.

read the full huginn overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K Elasticsearch ★ 78K Grafana ★ 77K

Related comparisons

uptime-kuma vs netdata worldmonitor vs netdata netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs grafana immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph mall vs prometheus mall vs nocodb mall vs etcd mall vs dbeaver mall vs orm prometheus vs nocodb mall vs milvus mall vs tidb

More Monitoring & Observability projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.

NetData vs Uptime Kuma NetData vs worldmonitor NetData vs Grafana NetData vs Sentry NetData vs SigNoz NetData vs Grafana Loki NetData vs beszel NetData vs cilium NetData vs Apache SkyWalking NetData vs jaeger NetData vs Vector NetData vs witr

Frequently asked questions

Is NetData or huginn more popular?

NetData has 80,561 GitHub stars and huginn has 49,967. NetData has the larger community by that measure.

Are NetData and huginn free?

Both are open source. NetData is licensed under GPL-3.0 and huginn under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between NetData and huginn?

NetData is written in Go and huginn in Ruby. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, NetData or huginn?

Choose NetData if you want the larger community (80,561 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose huginn if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.