head to head · open source

NetData vs lazyjournal

NetData has 80,564 GitHub stars, 6,630 forks, 393 open issues and last shipped yesterday. lazyjournal has 1,406 stars, 34 forks, 9 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. NetData leads on adoption by 5,630% (80,564 vs 1,406 stars). NetData is written in Go under GPL-3.0; lazyjournal is written in Go under MIT. NetData has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, lazyjournal 2%. NetData was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

NetData ★ 81K lazyjournal ★ 1.4K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 13541 open source comparisons

Side by side

NetData lazyjournal
GitHub stars ★ 81K ★ 1.4K
License GPL-3.0 MIT
Written in Go Go
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-08-01
Forks ⑂ 6.6K ⑂ 34
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick NetData if

  • You weight community size — 81K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full NetData profile →

pick lazyjournal if

  • You want the lazyjournal feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and lazyjournal fits your workflow better

full lazyjournal profile →

About NetData

Netdata is an open source, real time infrastructure monitoring platform written in Go and released under GPL 3.0, built for operators and lean teams who need per second visibility across Linux, macOS, FreeBSD, and Windows systems.

read the full NetData overview →

About lazyjournal

lazyjournal is a terminal user interface, written in Go, for reading and filtering logs from journald, auditd, the file system, Docker and Podman containers, Compose stacks and Kubernetes pods, and it is aimed at system administrators, SREs and developers who need to inspect logs from many different sources without leaving the terminal.

read the full lazyjournal overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K Elasticsearch ★ 78K Grafana ★ 77K

Related comparisons

uptime-kuma vs netdata worldmonitor vs netdata netdata vs grafana n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack llama-index vs haystack compose vs conductor compose vs xxl-job langgraph vs haystack compose vs gitleaks trivy vs gitleaks supabase vs nocodb mall vs prometheus mall vs nocodb supabase vs postgrest mall vs etcd mall vs dbeaver mall vs orm prometheus vs nocodb

More Monitoring & Observability projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.

NetData vs Uptime Kuma NetData vs worldmonitor NetData vs Grafana NetData vs huginn NetData vs Sentry NetData vs SigNoz NetData vs Grafana Loki NetData vs beszel NetData vs cilium NetData vs Apache SkyWalking NetData vs jaeger NetData vs Vector

Frequently asked questions

Is NetData or lazyjournal more popular?

NetData has 80,564 GitHub stars and lazyjournal has 1,406. NetData has the larger community by that measure.

Are NetData and lazyjournal free?

Both are open source. NetData is licensed under GPL-3.0 and lazyjournal under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between NetData and lazyjournal?

NetData is written in Go and lazyjournal in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, NetData or lazyjournal?

Choose NetData if you want the larger community (80,564 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose lazyjournal if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.