head to head · open source

NetData vs Keep

NetData has 80,561 GitHub stars, 6,630 forks, 393 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Keep has 12,331 stars, 1,508 forks, 609 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. NetData leads on adoption by 553% (80,561 vs 12,331 stars). NetData is written in Go under GPL-3.0; Keep is written in Python under a custom or non-standard licence. NetData has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, Keep 12%. NetData was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (alerting), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

NetData ★ 81K Keep ★ 12K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

NetData Keep
GitHub stars ★ 81K ★ 12K
License GPL-3.0 Custom / other
Written in Go Python
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-13
Forks ⑂ 6.6K ⑂ 1.5K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick NetData if

  • You weight community size — 81K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full NetData profile →

pick Keep if

  • You want the Keep feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and Keep fits your workflow better

full Keep profile →

About NetData

Netdata is an open source, real time infrastructure monitoring platform written in Go and released under GPL 3.0, built for operators and lean teams who need per second visibility across Linux, macOS, FreeBSD, and Windows systems.

read the full NetData overview →

About Keep

Keep is the open source AIOps and alert management platform: a Python based single pane of glass that unifies alerts and incidents, deduplicates and enriches them, and automates response through declarative YAML workflows, aimed at the SRE, platform and on call teams that operate many monitoring tools at once.

read the full Keep overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K Elasticsearch ★ 78K Grafana ★ 77K

Related comparisons

uptime-kuma vs netdata worldmonitor vs netdata netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph mall vs prometheus mall vs nocodb mall vs etcd mall vs dbeaver mall vs orm prometheus vs nocodb mall vs milvus mall vs tidb

More Monitoring & Observability projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.

NetData vs Uptime Kuma NetData vs worldmonitor NetData vs Grafana NetData vs huginn NetData vs Sentry NetData vs SigNoz NetData vs Grafana Loki NetData vs beszel NetData vs cilium NetData vs Apache SkyWalking NetData vs jaeger NetData vs Vector

Frequently asked questions

Is NetData or Keep more popular?

NetData has 80,561 GitHub stars and Keep has 12,331. NetData has the larger community by that measure.

Are NetData and Keep free?

Both are open source. NetData is licensed under GPL-3.0, and Keep has no licence declared in this registry. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between NetData and Keep?

NetData is written in Go and Keep in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, NetData or Keep?

Choose NetData if you want the larger community (80,561 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose Keep if its feature set, stack or Custom / other licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.