head to head · open source

mediamtx vs halcyon-video

mediamtx has 20,587 GitHub stars, 2,444 forks, 188 open issues and last shipped yesterday. halcyon-video has 961 stars, 42 forks, 80 open issues and last shipped yesterday. mediamtx leads on adoption by 2,042% (20,587 vs 961 stars). mediamtx is written in Go under MIT; halcyon-video is written in TypeScript under GPL-3.0. mediamtx has attracted 12% as many forks as stars, halcyon-video 4%. halcyon-video was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (media-server), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

mediamtx ★ 21K halcyon-video ★ 961 category Content & Publishing

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

mediamtx halcyon-video
GitHub stars ★ 21K ★ 961
License MIT GPL-3.0
Written in Go TypeScript
Last push 2026-11-02 2026-11-02
Forks ⑂ 2.4K ⑂ 42
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick mediamtx if

  • You weight community size — 21K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full mediamtx profile →

pick halcyon-video if

  • You want the halcyon-video feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and halcyon-video fits your workflow better

full halcyon-video profile →

About mediamtx

MediaMTX is a ready to use and zero dependency live media server and media proxy that allows to publish, read, proxy, record and playback real time video and audio streams. It has been conceived as a "media router" that routes media streams from one end to the other, with a focus on efficiency and portability. Features Publish streams to the server with Media over QUIC, SRT, WebRTC, RTSP, RTMP, HLS, MPEG TS, RTP, using FFmpeg, GStreamer, OBS Studio, Python , Golang, Unity, Web browsers, Raspberry Pi Cameras and more. Read streams from the server with Media over QUIC, SRT, WebRTC, RTSP, RTMP, HLS, using FFmpeg…

read the full mediamtx overview →

About halcyon-video

Halcyon Video — walk your media library The video store you remember, stocked with what you can watch. Halcyon Video turns movie night into a visit to the video store. Glide down real 3D aisles, pick up a VHS or DVD case, flip it to read the back, and take your choice to the counter — right down to the glossy rental bag. Start with streaming services, or bring your own Jellyfin, Plex, or Emby library. Add RomM for a games department. Halcyon gives those catalogs a place you can explore with a keyboard, gamepad, TV remote, or phone. Launch the hosted demo — no signup, media server, or API key required. It opens…

read the full halcyon-video overview →

More in Content & Publishing

Related comparisons

More Digital Asset Management (DAM) projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Digital Asset Management (DAM) field.

Frequently asked questions

Is mediamtx or halcyon-video more popular?

mediamtx has 20,587 GitHub stars and halcyon-video has 961. mediamtx has the larger community by that measure.

Are mediamtx and halcyon-video free?

Both are open source. mediamtx is licensed under MIT and halcyon-video under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between mediamtx and halcyon-video?

mediamtx is written in Go and halcyon-video in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, mediamtx or halcyon-video?

Choose mediamtx if you want the larger community (20,587 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose halcyon-video if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.