head to head · open source
mediamtx vs foss_photo_libraries
mediamtx has 20,170 GitHub stars, 2,374 forks, 188 open issues and last shipped yesterday. foss_photo_libraries has 2,803 stars, 72 forks, 27 open issues and last shipped 5 months ago. mediamtx leads on adoption by 620% (20,170 vs 2,803 stars). mediamtx is written in Go under MIT; foss_photo_libraries is written in Python under MIT. mediamtx has attracted 12% as many forks as stars, foss_photo_libraries 3%. mediamtx was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| mediamtx | foss_photo_libraries | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 20K | ★ 2.8K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | Go | Python |
| Last push | 2026-09-17 | 2026-04-18 |
| Forks | ⑂ 2.4K | ⑂ 72 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick mediamtx if
- You weight community size — 20K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick foss_photo_libraries if
- You want the foss_photo_libraries feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and foss_photo_libraries fits your workflow better
About mediamtx
MediaMTX is a ready to use, zero dependency live media server and media proxy written in Go, aimed at anyone who needs to publish, read, proxy, record and play back real time video and audio streams across many protocols without standing up a heavy media platform.
read the full mediamtx overview →
About foss_photo_libraries
foss photo libraries is a free and open source comparison project for photo libraries and digital asset management tools. It is an MIT licensed Python repository that maintains a public list of alternatives, including Chevereto, Damselfly, Ente, Foldergram, HomeGallery, Immich, Librephotos, Lychee, Nextcloud Photos, Nextcloud Memories, Photonix, Photofield, PiGallery2, PhotoPrism, Photoview, Piwigo, and Snapcrescent.
read the full foss_photo_libraries overview →
More in Content & Publishing
Related comparisons
More Digital Asset Management (DAM) projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Digital Asset Management (DAM) field.
Frequently asked questions
Is mediamtx or foss_photo_libraries more popular?
mediamtx has 20,170 GitHub stars and foss_photo_libraries has 2,803. mediamtx has the larger community by that measure.
Are mediamtx and foss_photo_libraries free?
Both are open source. mediamtx is licensed under MIT and foss_photo_libraries under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between mediamtx and foss_photo_libraries?
mediamtx is written in Go and foss_photo_libraries in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, mediamtx or foss_photo_libraries?
Choose mediamtx if you want the larger community (20,170 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose foss_photo_libraries if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.