head to head · open source
mediamtx vs nginx-http-flv-module
mediamtx has 20,587 GitHub stars, 2,444 forks, 188 open issues and last shipped yesterday. nginx-http-flv-module has 2,926 stars, 592 forks, 26 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. mediamtx leads on adoption by 604% (20,587 vs 2,926 stars). mediamtx is written in Go under MIT; nginx-http-flv-module is written in C under BSD-2-Clause. mediamtx has attracted 12% as many forks as stars, nginx-http-flv-module 20%. mediamtx was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (media-server), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| mediamtx | nginx-http-flv-module | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 21K | ★ 2.9K |
| License | MIT | BSD-2-Clause |
| Written in | Go | C |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-01 |
| Forks | ⑂ 2.4K | ⑂ 592 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick mediamtx if
- You weight community size — 21K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick nginx-http-flv-module if
- You want the nginx-http-flv-module feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the BSD-2-Clause license terms
- Your stack matches C
- You evaluated both and nginx-http-flv-module fits your workflow better
About mediamtx
MediaMTX is a ready to use and zero dependency live media server and media proxy that allows to publish, read, proxy, record and playback real time video and audio streams. It has been conceived as a "media router" that routes media streams from one end to the other, with a focus on efficiency and portability. Features Publish streams to the server with Media over QUIC, SRT, WebRTC, RTSP, RTMP, HLS, MPEG TS, RTP, using FFmpeg, GStreamer, OBS Studio, Python , Golang, Unity, Web browsers, Raspberry Pi Cameras and more. Read streams from the server with Media over QUIC, SRT, WebRTC, RTSP, RTMP, HLS, using FFmpeg…
read the full mediamtx overview →
About nginx-http-flv-module
nginx http flv module A media streaming server based on nginx rtmp module. 中文说明. Donate if you like this module. Many thanks to you! Credits Igor Sysoev, the creator of NGINX. Roman Arutyunyan, who created nginx rtmp module. Contributors, refer to AUTHORS for details. Features All features nginx rtmp module provides. Other features provided by nginx http flv module vs nginx rtmp module: Compatibility The NGINX version SHOULD be equal to or greater than 1.2.6, the compatibility with other versions is unknown. Systems supported Linux (recommended) / FreeBSD / MacOS / Windows (limited). Players supported VLC (RTMP…
read the full nginx-http-flv-module overview →
More in Content & Publishing
Related comparisons
More Digital Asset Management (DAM) projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Digital Asset Management (DAM) field.
Frequently asked questions
Is mediamtx or nginx-http-flv-module more popular?
mediamtx has 20,587 GitHub stars and nginx-http-flv-module has 2,926. mediamtx has the larger community by that measure.
Are mediamtx and nginx-http-flv-module free?
Both are open source. mediamtx is licensed under MIT and nginx-http-flv-module under BSD-2-Clause. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between mediamtx and nginx-http-flv-module?
mediamtx is written in Go and nginx-http-flv-module in C. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, mediamtx or nginx-http-flv-module?
Choose mediamtx if you want the larger community (20,587 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose nginx-http-flv-module if its feature set, stack or BSD-2-Clause licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.