head to head · open source

manim vs moveTo

manim has 94,765 GitHub stars, 7,769 forks, 500 open issues and last shipped 1 months ago. moveTo has 2,850 stars, 93 forks, 7 open issues and last shipped 9 months ago. manim leads on adoption by 3,225% (94,765 vs 2,850 stars). manim is written in Python under MIT; moveTo is written in JavaScript under MIT. manim has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, moveTo 3%. manim was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (animation), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

manim ★ 95K moveTo ★ 2.9K category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

manim moveTo
GitHub stars ★ 95K ★ 2.9K
License MIT MIT
Written in Python JavaScript
Last push 2026-09-09 2026-01-21
Forks ⑂ 7.8K ⑂ 93
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick manim if

  • You weight community size — 95K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full manim profile →

pick moveTo if

  • You want the moveTo feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and moveTo fits your workflow better

full moveTo profile →

About manim

Manim is a Python animation engine for precise, programmatic rendering of explanatory mathematics videos, built for educators, mathematicians, and developers who want frame accurate control over every element of a mathematical animation instead of editing on a timeline.

read the full manim overview →

About moveTo

moveTo is a dependency free JavaScript library for animating page scroll, aimed at front end developers who need smooth click to scroll and anchor movement without pulling in a larger framework.

read the full moveTo overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 190K Godot ★ 118K three.js ★ 116K open-design ★ 100K ant-design ★ 100K OpenCut ★ 93K

Related comparisons

ant-design vs manim open-design vs manim ant-design vs open-design firecrawl vs openpencil firecrawl vs draw-io firecrawl vs plasmic firecrawl vs quant-ux firecrawl vs grida firecrawl vs godot godot vs three-js firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame godot vs imgui three-js vs imgui firecrawl vs sbox godot vs bevy firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap firecrawl vs openseo firecrawl vs keploy

More Design & Prototyping projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Design & Prototyping field.

manim vs open-design manim vs ant-design manim vs anime manim vs hyperframes manim vs daisyui manim vs tabler manim vs motion manim vs layui manim vs lottie-ios manim vs vant manim vs primitives manim vs mojs

Frequently asked questions

Is manim or moveTo more popular?

manim has 94,765 GitHub stars and moveTo has 2,850. manim has the larger community by that measure.

Are manim and moveTo free?

Both are open source. manim is licensed under MIT and moveTo under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between manim and moveTo?

manim is written in Python and moveTo in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, manim or moveTo?

Choose manim if you want the larger community (94,765 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose moveTo if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.