head to head · open source

manim vs Gum

manim has 94,055 GitHub stars, 7,724 forks, 500 open issues and last shipped 10 days ago. Gum has 620 stars, 81 forks, 20 open issues and last shipped today. manim leads on adoption by 15,070% (94,055 vs 620 stars). manim is written in Python under MIT; Gum is written in C# under MIT. manim has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, Gum 13%. Gum was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

manim ★ 94K Gum ★ 620 category Miscellaneous

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

manim Gum
GitHub stars ★ 94K ★ 620
License MIT MIT
Written in Python C#
Last push 2026-09-09 2026-09-19
Forks ⑂ 7.7K ⑂ 81
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick manim if

  • You weight community size — 94K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full manim profile →

pick Gum if

  • You want the Gum feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches C#
  • You evaluated both and Gum fits your workflow better

full Gum profile →

About manim

Manim is a Python animation engine for precise, programmatic rendering of explanatory mathematics videos, built for educators, mathematicians, and developers who want frame accurate control over every element of a mathematical animation instead of editing on a timeline.

read the full manim overview →

About Gum

Gum is an MIT licensed C UI layout tool built on object oriented principles, distributed as NuGet runtimes for MonoGame, KNI, raylib, SkiaSharp, MAUI and FNA, and intended for developers who need one flexible, inheritance driven layout system across game engines and .NET platforms.

read the full Gum overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 182K Godot ★ 117K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 97K Home Assistant ★ 91K

Related comparisons

firecrawl vs openpencil firecrawl vs draw-io firecrawl vs plasmic firecrawl vs quant-ux firecrawl vs grida openpencil vs draw-io openpencil vs plasmic draw-io vs plasmic firecrawl vs godot firecrawl vs gdevelop godot vs home-assistant firecrawl vs monogame firecrawl vs sbox godot vs gdevelop godot vs monogame godot vs sbox firecrawl vs home-assistant firecrawl vs cratedb firecrawl vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs opencut godot vs cratedb godot vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs cratedb opencut vs cratedb

More Design & Prototyping projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Design & Prototyping field.

manim vs ant-design manim vs open-design manim vs anime manim vs hyperframes manim vs daisyui manim vs tabler manim vs motion manim vs layui manim vs Figma-Context-MCP manim vs Tkinter-Designer manim vs pencil manim vs dicebear

Frequently asked questions

Is manim or Gum more popular?

manim has 94,055 GitHub stars and Gum has 620. manim has the larger community by that measure.

Are manim and Gum free?

Both are open source. manim is licensed under MIT and Gum under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between manim and Gum?

manim is written in Python and Gum in C#. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, manim or Gum?

Choose manim if you want the larger community (94,055 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Gum if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.