head to head · open source
manim vs flowbite
manim has 96,012 GitHub stars, 7,895 forks, 500 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. flowbite has 9,381 stars, 867 forks, 257 open issues and last shipped 4 months ago. manim leads on adoption by 923% (96,012 vs 9,381 stars). manim is written in Python under MIT; flowbite is written in HTML under MIT. manim has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, flowbite 9%. manim was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| manim | flowbite | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 96K | ★ 9.4K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | Python | HTML |
| Last push | 2026-09-09 | 2026-06-27 |
| Forks | ⑂ 7.9K | ⑂ 867 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick manim if
- You weight community size — 96K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick flowbite if
- You want the flowbite feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches HTML
- You evaluated both and flowbite fits your workflow better
About manim
Manim is an engine for precise programmatic animations, designed for creating explanatory math videos. Note, there are two versions of manim. This repository began as a personal project by the author of 3Blue1Brown for the purpose of animating those videos, with video specific code available here. In 2020 a group of developers forked it into what is now the community edition, with a goal of being more stable, better tested, quicker to respond to community contributions, and all around friendlier to get started with. See this page for more details. Installation [!Warning] WARNING: These instructions are for…
read the full manim overview →
About flowbite
Build websites even faster with components on top of Tailwind CSS Table of Contents Table of Contents Documentation Getting started Install using NPM Include via CDN Bundled JavaScript Data attributes Init functions ESM and CJS TypeScript RTL support JavaScript Frameworks Back end Frameworks Components Figma Design System Flowbite Blocks Flowbite Icons Flowbite GPT Pro version Hire us Learn Design Concepts Community Copyright and license Documentation For full documentation, visit flowbite.com. Getting started Flowbite can be included as a plugin into an existing Tailwind CSS project and it is supposed to help…
read the full flowbite overview →
More in Miscellaneous
Related comparisons
More Design & Prototyping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Design & Prototyping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is manim or flowbite more popular?
manim has 96,012 GitHub stars and flowbite has 9,381. manim has the larger community by that measure.
Are manim and flowbite free?
Both are open source. manim is licensed under MIT and flowbite under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between manim and flowbite?
manim is written in Python and flowbite in HTML. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, manim or flowbite?
Choose manim if you want the larger community (96,012 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose flowbite if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.