head to head · open source

manim vs FigmaToCode

manim has 94,088 GitHub stars, 7,728 forks, 500 open issues and last shipped 11 days ago. FigmaToCode has 5,197 stars, 503 forks, 53 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. manim leads on adoption by 1,710% (94,088 vs 5,197 stars). manim is written in Python under MIT; FigmaToCode is written in TypeScript under GPL-3.0. manim has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, FigmaToCode 10%. manim was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

manim ★ 94K FigmaToCode ★ 5.2K category Miscellaneous

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

manim FigmaToCode
GitHub stars ★ 94K ★ 5.2K
License MIT GPL-3.0
Written in Python TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-09 2026-08-05
Forks ⑂ 7.7K ⑂ 503
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick manim if

  • You weight community size — 94K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full manim profile →

pick FigmaToCode if

  • You want the FigmaToCode feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and FigmaToCode fits your workflow better

full FigmaToCode profile →

About manim

Manim is a Python animation engine for precise, programmatic rendering of explanatory mathematics videos, built for educators, mathematicians, and developers who want frame accurate control over every element of a mathematical animation instead of editing on a timeline.

read the full manim overview →

About FigmaToCode

Figma to Code is a free, open source Figma plugin that converts a selected frame, component, or group of layers into editable HTML, React, Svelte, Tailwind, Flutter, or SwiftUI code without requiring an account, generation credits, or uploading designs to another service, and it is aimed at designers and developers working in the handoff moment between a visual design and a real implementation.

read the full FigmaToCode overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 182K Godot ★ 117K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 97K Home Assistant ★ 91K

Related comparisons

firecrawl vs openpencil firecrawl vs draw-io firecrawl vs plasmic firecrawl vs quant-ux firecrawl vs grida openpencil vs draw-io openpencil vs plasmic draw-io vs plasmic firecrawl vs godot firecrawl vs gdevelop godot vs home-assistant firecrawl vs monogame firecrawl vs sbox godot vs gdevelop godot vs monogame godot vs sbox firecrawl vs home-assistant firecrawl vs cratedb firecrawl vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs opencut godot vs cratedb godot vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs cratedb opencut vs cratedb

More Design & Prototyping projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Design & Prototyping field.

manim vs ant-design manim vs open-design manim vs anime manim vs hyperframes manim vs daisyui manim vs tabler manim vs motion manim vs layui manim vs lottie-ios manim vs vant manim vs Figma-Context-MCP manim vs Tkinter-Designer

Frequently asked questions

Is manim or FigmaToCode more popular?

manim has 94,088 GitHub stars and FigmaToCode has 5,197. manim has the larger community by that measure.

Are manim and FigmaToCode free?

Both are open source. manim is licensed under MIT and FigmaToCode under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between manim and FigmaToCode?

manim is written in Python and FigmaToCode in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, manim or FigmaToCode?

Choose manim if you want the larger community (94,088 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose FigmaToCode if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.