head to head · open source
manim vs design-tokens
manim has 96,497 GitHub stars, 7,928 forks, 500 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. design-tokens has 1,130 stars, 148 forks, 41 open issues and last shipped 9 months ago. manim leads on adoption by 8,440% (96,497 vs 1,130 stars). manim is written in Python under MIT; design-tokens is written in TypeScript under MIT. manim has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, design-tokens 13%. manim was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| manim | design-tokens | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 96K | ★ 1.1K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | Python | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-09-09 | 2026-02-16 |
| Forks | ⑂ 7.9K | ⑂ 148 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick manim if
- You weight community size — 96K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick design-tokens if
- You want the design-tokens feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and design-tokens fits your workflow better
About manim
Manim is an engine for precise programmatic animations, designed for creating explanatory math videos. Note, there are two versions of manim. This repository began as a personal project by the author of 3Blue1Brown for the purpose of animating those videos, with video specific code available here. In 2020 a group of developers forked it into what is now the community edition, with a goal of being more stable, better tested, quicker to respond to community contributions, and all around friendlier to get started with. See this page for more details. Installation [!Warning] WARNING: These instructions are for…
read the full manim overview →
About design-tokens
[!WARNING] This plugin is only partially supported! This means: I don't have capacity to add any features or really improve stuff. Bugfixes may be added if time allows. I am also happy to discuss and merge PRs. I personally have changed my opinion a long time ago to favor the source fo truth for design tokens to be in a json file. Figma should be a consumer so you only import tokens into figma. This is why I don't use plugins like this one anymore in my work. → Read more about the a better setup Design Tokens The Design Tokens plugin for Figma allows you to export design tokens into a json format that can be…
read the full design-tokens overview →
More in Miscellaneous
Related comparisons
More Design & Prototyping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Design & Prototyping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is manim or design-tokens more popular?
manim has 96,497 GitHub stars and design-tokens has 1,130. manim has the larger community by that measure.
Are manim and design-tokens free?
Both are open source. manim is licensed under MIT and design-tokens under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between manim and design-tokens?
manim is written in Python and design-tokens in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, manim or design-tokens?
Choose manim if you want the larger community (96,497 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose design-tokens if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.