head to head · open source

manim vs charm

manim has 94,045 GitHub stars, 7,724 forks, 500 open issues and last shipped 10 days ago. charm has 649 stars, 169 forks, 9 open issues and last shipped 9 days ago. manim leads on adoption by 14,391% (94,045 vs 649 stars). manim is written in Python under MIT; charm is written in Python under LGPL-3.0. manim has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, charm 26%. charm was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (python), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

manim ★ 94K charm ★ 649 category Miscellaneous

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

manim charm
GitHub stars ★ 94K ★ 649
License MIT LGPL-3.0
Written in Python Python
Last push 2026-09-09 2026-09-10
Forks ⑂ 7.7K ⑂ 169
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick manim if

  • You weight community size — 94K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full manim profile →

pick charm if

  • You want the charm feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the LGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and charm fits your workflow better

full charm profile →

About manim

Manim is a Python animation engine for precise, programmatic rendering of explanatory mathematics videos, built for educators, mathematicians, and developers who want frame accurate control over every element of a mathematical animation instead of editing on a timeline.

read the full manim overview →

About charm

Charm (Charm Crypto) is a Python based framework for rapidly prototyping advanced cryptosystems — attribute based encryption, identity based encryption, pairing based schemes, threshold ECDSA, and zero knowledge proofs — built for researchers and engineers who need working schemes without hand writing the underlying mathematics.

read the full charm overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 182K Godot ★ 117K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 97K Home Assistant ★ 91K

Related comparisons

firecrawl vs openpencil firecrawl vs draw-io firecrawl vs plasmic firecrawl vs quant-ux firecrawl vs grida openpencil vs draw-io openpencil vs plasmic draw-io vs plasmic firecrawl vs godot firecrawl vs gdevelop godot vs home-assistant firecrawl vs monogame firecrawl vs sbox godot vs gdevelop godot vs monogame godot vs sbox firecrawl vs home-assistant firecrawl vs cratedb firecrawl vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs opencut godot vs cratedb godot vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs cratedb opencut vs cratedb

More Design & Prototyping projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Design & Prototyping field.

manim vs ant-design manim vs open-design manim vs anime manim vs hyperframes manim vs daisyui manim vs tabler manim vs Figma-Context-MCP manim vs Tkinter-Designer manim vs pencil manim vs dicebear manim vs OpenPencil manim vs draw.io

Frequently asked questions

Is manim or charm more popular?

manim has 94,045 GitHub stars and charm has 649. manim has the larger community by that measure.

Are manim and charm free?

Both are open source. manim is licensed under MIT and charm under LGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between manim and charm?

manim is written in Python and charm in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, manim or charm?

Choose manim if you want the larger community (94,045 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose charm if its feature set, stack or LGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.