head to head · open source
Uptime Kuma vs kubeshark
Uptime Kuma has 91,578 GitHub stars, 8,441 forks, 805 open issues and last shipped today. kubeshark has 12,082 stars, 549 forks, 149 open issues and last shipped 11 days ago. Uptime Kuma leads on adoption by 658% (91,578 vs 12,082 stars). Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript under MIT; kubeshark is written in Go under Apache-2.0. Uptime Kuma has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, kubeshark 5%. Uptime Kuma was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (docker), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Uptime Kuma | kubeshark | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 92K | ★ 12K |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | JavaScript | Go |
| Last push | 2026-09-20 | 2026-09-09 |
| Forks | ⑂ 8.4K | ⑂ 549 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Uptime Kuma if
- You weight community size — 92K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick kubeshark if
- You want the kubeshark feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and kubeshark fits your workflow better
About Uptime Kuma
Uptime Kuma is a free, MIT licensed, self hosted monitoring tool with a reactive web dashboard, built for operators and teams that want to watch their own HTTP, TCP, and DNS endpoints and keep the resulting data on their own infrastructure.
read the full Uptime Kuma overview →
About kubeshark
Kubeshark is an Apache 2.0, eBPF powered network observability tool for Kubernetes that indexes cluster wide L4/L7 traffic with full Kubernetes context and makes that traffic queryable by AI agents through the Model Context Protocol and by humans through a real time dashboard.
read the full kubeshark overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Uptime Kuma or kubeshark more popular?
Uptime Kuma has 91,578 GitHub stars and kubeshark has 12,082. Uptime Kuma has the larger community by that measure.
Are Uptime Kuma and kubeshark free?
Both are open source. Uptime Kuma is licensed under MIT and kubeshark under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Uptime Kuma and kubeshark?
Uptime Kuma is written in JavaScript and kubeshark in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Uptime Kuma or kubeshark?
Choose Uptime Kuma if you want the larger community (91,578 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose kubeshark if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.