head to head · open source

kong vs tutorials

kong has 44,148 GitHub stars, 5,210 forks, 200 open issues and last shipped 11 days ago. tutorials has 4,692 stars, 3,112 forks, 45 open issues and last shipped 4 months ago. kong leads on adoption by 841% (44,148 vs 4,692 stars). kong is written in Lua under Apache-2.0; tutorials is written in HCL under MIT. kong has attracted 12% as many forks as stars, tutorials 66%. kong was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (devops, kubernetes), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

kong ★ 44K tutorials ★ 4.7K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

kong tutorials
GitHub stars ★ 44K ★ 4.7K
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in Lua HCL
Last push 2026-09-07 2026-05-17
Forks ⑂ 5.2K ⑂ 3.1K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick kong if

  • You weight community size — 44K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Lua
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full kong profile →

pick tutorials if

  • You want the tutorials feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches HCL
  • You evaluated both and tutorials fits your workflow better

full tutorials profile →

About kong

Kong (also known as Kong Gateway) is an open source, cloud native, platform agnostic API, LLM, and MCP gateway, licensed under Apache 2.0, built for platform, DevOps, and AI engineering teams that need a single high performance layer to route, secure, and observe both conventional API traffic and agentic LLM traffic.

read the full kong overview →

About tutorials

tutorials is an MIT licensed collection of DevOps lesson material and supporting infrastructure code, organised around the author's YouTube courses and aimed at engineers who want runnable examples for Terraform, Kubernetes, AWS, GCP, Ansible, Packer and serverless work.

read the full tutorials overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

kong vs trivy kong vs opentofu kong vs jenkins kong vs pulumi kong vs floci kong vs argo-cd kong vs sops trivy vs opentofu uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph

More Cloud Infrastructure Management projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Cloud Infrastructure Management field.

kong vs trivy kong vs OpenTofu kong vs jenkins kong vs Pulumi kong vs floci kong vs argo-cd kong vs sops kong vs wtf kong vs dagger kong vs task kong vs aws-cdk kong vs infracost

Frequently asked questions

Is kong or tutorials more popular?

kong has 44,148 GitHub stars and tutorials has 4,692. kong has the larger community by that measure.

Are kong and tutorials free?

Both are open source. kong is licensed under Apache-2.0 and tutorials under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between kong and tutorials?

kong is written in Lua and tutorials in HCL. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, kong or tutorials?

Choose kong if you want the larger community (44,148 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose tutorials if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.