head to head · open source

Docker vs kong

Docker has 72,113 GitHub stars, 19,233 forks, 3,902 open issues and last shipped yesterday. kong has 44,158 stars, 5,210 forks, 200 open issues and last shipped 13 days ago. Docker leads on adoption by 63% (72,113 vs 44,158 stars). Docker is written in Go under Apache-2.0; kong is written in Lua under Apache-2.0. Docker has attracted 27% as many forks as stars, kong 12%. Docker was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Docker ★ 72K kong ★ 44K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Docker kong
GitHub stars ★ 72K ★ 44K
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Go Lua
Last push 2026-09-19 2026-09-07
Forks ⑂ 19K ⑂ 5.2K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Docker if

  • You weight community size — 72K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Docker profile →

pick kong if

  • You want the kong feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Lua
  • You evaluated both and kong fits your workflow better

full kong profile →

About Docker

Docker, published here as the Moby Project, is the open source collection of container toolkit components and the framework for assembling them into custom container based systems, built for engineers, integrators and enthusiasts who want to modify, hack and build on container code rather than buy a commercially supported product.

read the full Docker overview →

About kong

Kong (also known as Kong Gateway) is an open source, cloud native, platform agnostic API, LLM, and MCP gateway, licensed under Apache 2.0, built for platform, DevOps, and AI engineering teams that need a single high performance layer to route, secure, and observe both conventional API traffic and agentic LLM traffic.

read the full kong overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

kubernetes vs docker kubernetes vs kong docker vs coolify docker vs dokploy docker vs casaos kubernetes vs portainer kubernetes vs trivy kubernetes vs opentofu kubernetes vs jenkins kubernetes vs pulumi kubernetes vs floci n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack kubernetes vs rancher ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor

More Cloud Infrastructure Management projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Cloud Infrastructure Management field.

Docker vs kubernetes Docker vs portainer Docker vs trivy Docker vs OpenTofu Docker vs jenkins Docker vs Pulumi Docker vs floci Docker vs argo-cd Docker vs sops Docker vs wtf Docker vs dagger Docker vs task

Frequently asked questions

Is Docker or kong more popular?

Docker has 72,113 GitHub stars and kong has 44,158. Docker has the larger community by that measure.

Are Docker and kong free?

Both are open source. Docker is licensed under Apache-2.0 and kong under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Docker and kong?

Docker is written in Go and kong in Lua. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Docker or kong?

Choose Docker if you want the larger community (72,113 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose kong if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.