head to head · open source

compose vs Healthchecks

compose has 38,195 GitHub stars, 5,825 forks, 111 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Healthchecks has 10,344 stars, 1,012 forks, 53 open issues and last shipped 6 days ago. compose leads on adoption by 269% (38,195 vs 10,344 stars). compose is written in Go under Apache-2.0; Healthchecks is written in Python under BSD-3-Clause. compose has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, Healthchecks 10%. compose was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

compose ★ 38K Healthchecks ★ 10K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

compose Healthchecks
GitHub stars ★ 38K ★ 10K
License Apache-2.0 BSD-3-Clause
Written in Go Python
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-14
Forks ⑂ 5.8K ⑂ 1.0K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick compose if

  • You weight community size — 38K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full compose profile →

pick Healthchecks if

  • You want the Healthchecks feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the BSD-3-Clause license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and Healthchecks fits your workflow better

full Healthchecks profile →

About compose

Docker Compose is an Apache 2.0 licensed Go tool that defines and runs multi container applications on Docker from a single Compose file, aimed at developers and operators who need several containers to start together as one isolated application.

read the full compose overview →

About Healthchecks

Healthchecks is an open source cron job and background task monitoring service written in Python and Django. It lives in the Infrastructure and Operations ecosystem, in the orchestration and scheduling area, where teams need to know whether recurring jobs ran as expected. The service listens for HTTP requests and email messages, called pings, from cron jobs and scheduled tasks, called checks. When a ping does not arrive on time, Healthchecks sends alerts.

read the full Healthchecks overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

ansible vs compose n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack kubernetes vs rancher ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana kubernetes vs docker kubernetes vs kong kubernetes vs portainer kubernetes vs trivy kubernetes vs opentofu kubernetes vs jenkins kubernetes vs pulumi kubernetes vs floci

More Orchestration & Scheduling projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Orchestration & Scheduling field.

compose vs ansible compose vs conductor compose vs xxl-job compose vs gitleaks compose vs Kestra compose vs haystack compose vs rancher compose vs Prefect compose vs Archon compose vs Temporal compose vs rowboat compose vs Trigger

Frequently asked questions

Is compose or Healthchecks more popular?

compose has 38,195 GitHub stars and Healthchecks has 10,344. compose has the larger community by that measure.

Are compose and Healthchecks free?

Both are open source. compose is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Healthchecks under BSD-3-Clause. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between compose and Healthchecks?

compose is written in Go and Healthchecks in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, compose or Healthchecks?

Choose compose if you want the larger community (38,195 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose Healthchecks if its feature set, stack or BSD-3-Clause licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.