head to head · open source

compose vs rancher

compose has 38,175 GitHub stars, 5,817 forks, 111 open issues and last shipped yesterday. rancher has 25,922 stars, 3,222 forks, 3,371 open issues and last shipped yesterday. compose leads on adoption by 47% (38,175 vs 25,922 stars). compose is written in Go under Apache-2.0; rancher is written in Go under Apache-2.0. compose has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, rancher 12%. rancher was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (docker, orchestration), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

compose ★ 38K rancher ★ 26K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

compose rancher
GitHub stars ★ 38K ★ 26K
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Go Go
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 5.8K ⑂ 3.2K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick compose if

  • You weight community size — 38K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full compose profile →

pick rancher if

  • You want the rancher feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and rancher fits your workflow better

full rancher profile →

About compose

Docker Compose is an Apache 2.0 licensed Go tool that defines and runs multi container applications on Docker from a single Compose file, aimed at developers and operators who need several containers to start together as one isolated application.

read the full compose overview →

About rancher

Rancher is an Apache 2.0 licensed, Go based open source container management platform for organizations that deploy containers in production and need to run Kubernetes everywhere while meeting IT requirements and empowering DevOps teams.

read the full rancher overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

compose vs conductor compose vs xxl-job compose vs gitleaks compose vs kestra compose vs haystack compose vs prefect conductor vs xxl-job uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph mall vs prometheus

More Orchestration & Scheduling projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Orchestration & Scheduling field.

compose vs conductor compose vs xxl-job compose vs gitleaks compose vs Kestra compose vs haystack compose vs Prefect compose vs Archon compose vs Temporal compose vs rowboat compose vs Trigger compose vs dolphinscheduler compose vs agent-framework

Frequently asked questions

Is compose or rancher more popular?

compose has 38,175 GitHub stars and rancher has 25,922. compose has the larger community by that measure.

Are compose and rancher free?

Both are open source. compose is licensed under Apache-2.0 and rancher under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between compose and rancher?

compose is written in Go and rancher in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, compose or rancher?

Choose compose if you want the larger community (38,175 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose rancher if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.