head to head · open source

compose vs xxl-job

compose has 38,175 GitHub stars, 5,817 forks, 111 open issues and last shipped yesterday. xxl-job has 30,562 stars, 11,486 forks, 79 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. compose leads on adoption by 25% (38,175 vs 30,562 stars). compose is written in Go under Apache-2.0; xxl-job is written in Java under GPL-3.0. compose has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, xxl-job 38%. compose was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

compose ★ 38K xxl-job ★ 31K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

compose xxl-job
GitHub stars ★ 38K ★ 31K
License Apache-2.0 GPL-3.0
Written in Go Java
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-07-21
Forks ⑂ 5.8K ⑂ 11K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick compose if

  • You weight community size — 38K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full compose profile →

pick xxl-job if

  • You want the xxl-job feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You evaluated both and xxl-job fits your workflow better

full xxl-job profile →

About compose

Docker Compose is an Apache 2.0 licensed Go tool that defines and runs multi container applications on Docker from a single Compose file, aimed at developers and operators who need several containers to start together as one isolated application.

read the full compose overview →

About xxl-job

XXL JOB is a distributed task scheduling framework written in Java and released under the GPL 3.0 licence, built for teams that need scheduled jobs to run reliably across a cluster of machines rather than inside a single application process.

read the full xxl-job overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

compose vs conductor compose vs gitleaks compose vs kestra compose vs haystack compose vs rancher conductor vs xxl-job compose vs prefect uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph mall vs prometheus

More Orchestration & Scheduling projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Orchestration & Scheduling field.

compose vs conductor compose vs gitleaks compose vs Kestra compose vs haystack compose vs rancher compose vs Prefect compose vs Archon compose vs Temporal compose vs rowboat compose vs Trigger compose vs dolphinscheduler compose vs agent-framework

Frequently asked questions

Is compose or xxl-job more popular?

compose has 38,175 GitHub stars and xxl-job has 30,562. compose has the larger community by that measure.

Are compose and xxl-job free?

Both are open source. compose is licensed under Apache-2.0 and xxl-job under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between compose and xxl-job?

compose is written in Go and xxl-job in Java. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, compose or xxl-job?

Choose compose if you want the larger community (38,175 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose xxl-job if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.