head to head · open source
Gitea vs reviewdog
Gitea has 58,826 GitHub stars, 7,348 forks, 2,455 open issues and last shipped yesterday. reviewdog has 9,716 stars, 512 forks, 131 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Gitea leads on adoption by 505% (58,826 vs 9,716 stars). Gitea is written in Go under MIT; reviewdog is written in Go under MIT. Gitea has attracted 12% as many forks as stars, reviewdog 5%. Gitea was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 3 topic tags (bitbucket, github, gitlab), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Gitea | reviewdog | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 59K | ★ 9.7K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | Go | Go |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 7.3K | ⑂ 512 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Gitea if
- You weight community size — 59K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick reviewdog if
- You want the reviewdog feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and reviewdog fits your workflow better
About Gitea
Gitea 繁體中文 简体中文 Purpose The goal of Gitea is to make the easiest, fastest, and most painless way of setting up a self hosted all in one software development service, including Git hosting, code management, code review, issue tracking, project kanban, wiki, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD which can reuse GitHub Actions. As Gitea is written in Go, it works across all the platforms and architectures that are supported by Go, including Linux, macOS, FreeBSD/OpenBSD and Windows on x86, amd64, ARM, RISC V 64 and PowerPC architectures. For online demonstrations, you can visit demo.gitea.com. For…
read the full Gitea overview →
About reviewdog
reviewdog A code review dog who keeps your codebase healthy. reviewdog provides a way to post review comments to code hosting services, such as GitHub, automatically by integrating with any linter tools with ease. It uses an output of lint tools and posts them as a comment if findings are in the diff of patches to review. reviewdog also supports running in the local environment to filter the output of lint tools by diff. design doc Table of Contents Installation Input Format 'errorformat' Available pre defined 'errorformat' Reviewdog Diagnostic Format (RDFormat) Diff checkstyle format SARIF format Code…
read the full reviewdog overview →
More in Developer Tools
Related comparisons
More Version Control & Collaboration projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Version Control & Collaboration field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Gitea or reviewdog more popular?
Gitea has 58,826 GitHub stars and reviewdog has 9,716. Gitea has the larger community by that measure.
Are Gitea and reviewdog free?
Both are open source. Gitea is licensed under MIT and reviewdog under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Gitea and reviewdog?
Gitea is written in Go and reviewdog in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Gitea or reviewdog?
Choose Gitea if you want the larger community (58,826 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose reviewdog if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.