head to head · open source
Gitea vs brooks-lint
Gitea has 58,667 GitHub stars, 7,305 forks, 2,455 open issues and last shipped yesterday. brooks-lint has 1,542 stars, 72 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Gitea leads on adoption by 3,705% (58,667 vs 1,542 stars). Gitea is written in Go under MIT; brooks-lint is written in HTML under MIT. Gitea has attracted 12% as many forks as stars, brooks-lint 5%. brooks-lint was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Gitea | brooks-lint | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 59K | ★ 1.5K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | Go | HTML |
| Last push | 2026-10-24 | 2026-10-24 |
| Forks | ⑂ 7.3K | ⑂ 72 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Gitea if
- You weight community size — 59K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick brooks-lint if
- You want the brooks-lint feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches HTML
- You evaluated both and brooks-lint fits your workflow better
About Gitea
Gitea 繁體中文 简体中文 Purpose The goal of Gitea is to make the easiest, fastest, and most painless way of setting up a self hosted all in one software development service, including Git hosting, code management, code review, issue tracking, project kanban, wiki, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD which can reuse GitHub Actions. As Gitea is written in Go, it works across all the platforms and architectures that are supported by Go, including Linux, macOS, FreeBSD/OpenBSD and Windows on x86, amd64, ARM, RISC V 64 and PowerPC architectures. For online demonstrations, you can visit demo.gitea.com. For…
read the full Gitea overview →
About brooks-lint
brooks lint AI code reviews grounded in twelve classic engineering books. Consistent. Traceable. Actionable. English · 简体中文 · 繁體中文 · 日本語 · 한국어 · Español Quick Start • The Six Decay Risks • What It Looks Like • Benchmark • Installation → Visit the website "The bearing of a child takes nine months, no matter how many women are assigned." — Frederick Brooks, The Mythical Man Month (1975) 50 years later, Brooks was still right — and so were McConnell, Fowler, Martin, Hunt & Thomas, Evans, Ousterhout, Winters, Meszaros, Osherove, Feathers, and the Google Testing team. Most code quality tools count lines and…
read the full brooks-lint overview →
More in Developer Tools
Related comparisons
More Version Control & Collaboration projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Version Control & Collaboration field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Gitea or brooks-lint more popular?
Gitea has 58,667 GitHub stars and brooks-lint has 1,542. Gitea has the larger community by that measure.
Are Gitea and brooks-lint free?
Both are open source. Gitea is licensed under MIT and brooks-lint under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Gitea and brooks-lint?
Gitea is written in Go and brooks-lint in HTML. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Gitea or brooks-lint?
Choose Gitea if you want the larger community (58,667 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose brooks-lint if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.