head to head · open source

GitButler vs hunk

GitButler has 21,668 GitHub stars, 1,013 forks, 439 open issues and last shipped yesterday. hunk has 9,323 stars, 300 forks, 162 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. GitButler leads on adoption by 132% (21,668 vs 9,323 stars). GitButler is written in Rust under a custom or non-standard licence; hunk is written in TypeScript under MIT. GitButler has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, hunk 3%. GitButler was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (git), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

GitButler ★ 22K hunk ★ 9.3K category Developer Tools

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

GitButler hunk
GitHub stars ★ 22K ★ 9.3K
License Custom / other MIT
Written in Rust TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-14
Forks ⑂ 1.0K ⑂ 300
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick GitButler if

  • You weight community size — 22K stars and counting
  • You want the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full GitButler profile →

pick hunk if

  • You want the hunk feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and hunk fits your workflow better

full hunk profile →

About GitButler

GitButler is a Git based version control client with a graphical interface and a command line interface. It is built for AI powered workflows and described as a drop in Git user interface replacement for people and agents. The project lives in the Git and GitHub ecosystem, and it is built as a Tauri desktop application using Rust, Svelte, and TypeScript.

read the full GitButler overview →

About hunk

hunk is a review first terminal diff viewer for agentic coders: an MIT licensed TypeScript tool that opens agent authored changesets in an interactive terminal review interface instead of raw patch text, aimed at developers who must inspect changes produced by AI coding agents or by collaborators.

read the full hunk overview →

More in Developer Tools

OpenCode ★ 208K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K pi ★ 107K fastapi ★ 102K Neovim ★ 102K

Related comparisons

gitea vs gitbutler gitea vs gogs gitea vs code-review-graph gitea vs open-code-review gitea vs reflex gitea vs gitlab gogs vs code-review-graph gogs vs open-code-review opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip opencode vs orca opencode vs cline opencode vs aider opencode vs continue opencode vs tabby opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed langflow vs neovim langflow vs zed opencode vs kilocode opencode vs codeedit neovim vs zed langflow vs kilocode

More Version Control & Collaboration projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Version Control & Collaboration field.

GitButler vs Gitea GitButler vs Gogs GitButler vs open-code-review GitButler vs code-review-graph GitButler vs Reflex GitButler vs GitLab GitButler vs Coder GitButler vs gitpod GitButler vs pr-agent GitButler vs Encore GitButler vs reviewdog GitButler vs plannotator

Frequently asked questions

Is GitButler or hunk more popular?

GitButler has 21,668 GitHub stars and hunk has 9,323. GitButler has the larger community by that measure.

Are GitButler and hunk free?

Both are open source. GitButler has no licence declared in this registry, and hunk is licensed under MIT. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between GitButler and hunk?

GitButler is written in Rust and hunk in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, GitButler or hunk?

Choose GitButler if you want the larger community (21,668 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose hunk if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.