head to head · open source

flow-next vs roam-code

flow-next has 698 GitHub stars, 55 forks, 6 open issues and last shipped yesterday. roam-code has 518 stars, 50 forks, 12 open issues and last shipped yesterday. flow-next leads on adoption by 35% (698 vs 518 stars). flow-next is written in Python under MIT; roam-code is written in Python under Apache-2.0. flow-next has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, roam-code 10%. flow-next was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (cli, code-review), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

flow-next ★ 698 roam-code ★ 518 category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

flow-next roam-code
GitHub stars ★ 698 ★ 518
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in Python Python
Last push 2026-09-19 2026-09-19
Forks ⑂ 55 ⑂ 50
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick flow-next if

  • You weight community size — 698 stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full flow-next profile →

pick roam-code if

  • You want the roam-code feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and roam-code fits your workflow better

full roam-code profile →

About flow-next

Flow Next is a workflow plugin that runs inside AI coding agents such as Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, and Droid, turning a change request into specs, implementation, adversarial cross model review, and a pull request with recorded evidence, and it is aimed at individual developers and teams who already generate code with agents but lack a repeatable way to verify the result.

read the full flow-next overview →

About roam-code

roam code is a local first codebase intelligence CLI and MCP server that gives AI coding agents a reusable SQLite code graph, static pattern findings, and change safety checks across 28 languages — built for developers and teams who run coding agents against their own repositories and want no API key, no account, and no automatic source code upload.

read the full roam-code overview →

More in Developer Tools

ECC ★ 263K react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 209K vscode ★ 193K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K

Related comparisons

gitea vs gogs codegraph vs code-review-graph gitea vs open-code-review gitea vs code-review-graph gitea vs reflex gogs vs open-code-review gitea vs gitlab gitea vs gitbutler openclaw vs langflow ecc vs react ecc vs langflow react vs langflow ecc vs supabase react vs supabase n8n vs langflow ecc vs puppeteer openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip

More Version Control & Collaboration projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Version Control & Collaboration field.

flow-next vs Gitea flow-next vs Gogs flow-next vs open-code-review flow-next vs code-review-graph flow-next vs Reflex flow-next vs GitLab flow-next vs GitButler flow-next vs Coder flow-next vs gitpod flow-next vs pr-agent flow-next vs Encore flow-next vs reviewdog

Frequently asked questions

Is flow-next or roam-code more popular?

flow-next has 698 GitHub stars and roam-code has 518. flow-next has the larger community by that measure.

Are flow-next and roam-code free?

Both are open source. flow-next is licensed under MIT and roam-code under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between flow-next and roam-code?

flow-next is written in Python and roam-code in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, flow-next or roam-code?

Choose flow-next if you want the larger community (698 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose roam-code if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.