head to head · open source

open-code-review vs flow-next

open-code-review has 37,770 GitHub stars, 2,693 forks, 160 open issues and last shipped yesterday. flow-next has 698 stars, 55 forks, 6 open issues and last shipped yesterday. open-code-review leads on adoption by 5,311% (37,770 vs 698 stars). open-code-review is written in Go under Apache-2.0; flow-next is written in Python under MIT. open-code-review has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, flow-next 8%. flow-next was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (code-review), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

open-code-review ★ 38K flow-next ★ 698 category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

open-code-review flow-next
GitHub stars ★ 38K ★ 698
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in Go Python
Last push 2026-09-19 2026-09-19
Forks ⑂ 2.7K ⑂ 55
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick open-code-review if

  • You weight community size — 38K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full open-code-review profile →

pick flow-next if

  • You want the flow-next feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and flow-next fits your workflow better

full flow-next profile →

About open-code-review

Open Code Review is an Apache 2.0, Go based AI code review CLI that reads Git diffs, sends changed files to a configurable LLM through a tool using agent, and returns line level review comments, built for developers and platform teams that want large scale review automated inside infrastructure they control.

read the full open-code-review overview →

About flow-next

Flow Next is a workflow plugin that runs inside AI coding agents such as Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, and Droid, turning a change request into specs, implementation, adversarial cross model review, and a pull request with recorded evidence, and it is aimed at individual developers and teams who already generate code with agents but lack a repeatable way to verify the result.

read the full flow-next overview →

More in Developer Tools

ECC ★ 263K react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 209K vscode ★ 193K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K

Related comparisons

gitea vs open-code-review gogs vs open-code-review gitea vs gogs codegraph vs code-review-graph gitea vs code-review-graph gitea vs reflex gitea vs gitlab gitea vs gitbutler openclaw vs langflow ecc vs react ecc vs langflow react vs langflow ecc vs supabase react vs supabase n8n vs langflow ecc vs puppeteer openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip

More Version Control & Collaboration projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Version Control & Collaboration field.

open-code-review vs Gitea open-code-review vs Gogs open-code-review vs code-review-graph open-code-review vs Reflex open-code-review vs GitLab open-code-review vs GitButler open-code-review vs Coder open-code-review vs gitpod open-code-review vs pr-agent open-code-review vs Encore open-code-review vs reviewdog open-code-review vs hunk

Frequently asked questions

Is open-code-review or flow-next more popular?

open-code-review has 37,770 GitHub stars and flow-next has 698. open-code-review has the larger community by that measure.

Are open-code-review and flow-next free?

Both are open source. open-code-review is licensed under Apache-2.0 and flow-next under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between open-code-review and flow-next?

open-code-review is written in Go and flow-next in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, open-code-review or flow-next?

Choose open-code-review if you want the larger community (37,770 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose flow-next if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.