head to head · open source

Reflex vs flow-next

Reflex has 28,893 GitHub stars, 1,777 forks, 346 open issues and last shipped today. flow-next has 698 stars, 55 forks, 6 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Reflex leads on adoption by 4,039% (28,893 vs 698 stars). Reflex is written in Python under Apache-2.0; flow-next is written in Python under MIT. Reflex has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, flow-next 8%. Reflex was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Reflex ★ 29K flow-next ★ 698 category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Reflex flow-next
GitHub stars ★ 29K ★ 698
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in Python Python
Last push 2026-09-20 2026-09-19
Forks ⑂ 1.8K ⑂ 55
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Reflex if

  • You weight community size — 29K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Reflex profile →

pick flow-next if

  • You want the flow-next feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and flow-next fits your workflow better

full flow-next profile →

About Reflex

Reflex is an open source Apache 2.0 Python library for building full stack web apps and internal tools entirely in Python, aimed at Python developers who want a browser based frontend without learning JavaScript.

read the full Reflex overview →

About flow-next

Flow Next is a workflow plugin that runs inside AI coding agents such as Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, and Droid, turning a change request into specs, implementation, adversarial cross model review, and a pull request with recorded evidence, and it is aimed at individual developers and teams who already generate code with agents but lack a repeatable way to verify the result.

read the full flow-next overview →

More in Developer Tools

ECC ★ 263K react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 209K vscode ★ 193K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K

Related comparisons

gitea vs reflex gitea vs gogs codegraph vs code-review-graph gitea vs open-code-review gitea vs code-review-graph gogs vs open-code-review gitea vs gitlab gitea vs gitbutler openclaw vs langflow ecc vs react ecc vs langflow react vs langflow ecc vs supabase react vs supabase n8n vs langflow ecc vs puppeteer openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip

More Version Control & Collaboration projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Version Control & Collaboration field.

Reflex vs Gitea Reflex vs Gogs Reflex vs open-code-review Reflex vs code-review-graph Reflex vs GitLab Reflex vs GitButler Reflex vs Coder Reflex vs gitpod Reflex vs pr-agent Reflex vs Encore Reflex vs reviewdog Reflex vs hunk

Frequently asked questions

Is Reflex or flow-next more popular?

Reflex has 28,893 GitHub stars and flow-next has 698. Reflex has the larger community by that measure.

Are Reflex and flow-next free?

Both are open source. Reflex is licensed under Apache-2.0 and flow-next under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Reflex and flow-next?

Reflex is written in Python and flow-next in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Reflex or flow-next?

Choose Reflex if you want the larger community (28,893 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose flow-next if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.