head to head · open source

floci vs webhook

floci has 24,500 GitHub stars, 2,645 forks, 130 open issues and last shipped yesterday. webhook has 12,134 stars, 875 forks, 127 open issues and last shipped 14 days ago. floci leads on adoption by 102% (24,500 vs 12,134 stars). floci is written in Java under MIT; webhook is written in Go under MIT. floci has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, webhook 7%. floci was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (devops), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

floci ★ 25K webhook ★ 12K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

floci webhook
GitHub stars ★ 25K ★ 12K
License MIT MIT
Written in Java Go
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-04
Forks ⑂ 2.6K ⑂ 875
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick floci if

  • You weight community size — 25K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full floci profile →

pick webhook if

  • You want the webhook feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and webhook fits your workflow better

full webhook profile →

About floci

Floci is a free, MIT licensed, open source local AWS emulator that gives developers, testers, and CI pipelines AWS shaped services on their own machine without a cloud account, an auth token, or paid feature gates.

read the full floci overview →

About webhook

webhook is a lightweight, MIT licensed incoming webhook server written in Go that exposes HTTP endpoints which execute configured shell commands, built for developers and operators who want a push from GitHub, Bitbucket, Slack, or Mattermost to run a deploy or maintenance script on their own server.

read the full webhook overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

kong vs floci kong vs trivy kong vs opentofu kong vs jenkins kong vs pulumi kong vs argo-cd trivy vs opentofu kong vs sops uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph

More Cloud Infrastructure Management projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Cloud Infrastructure Management field.

floci vs kong floci vs trivy floci vs OpenTofu floci vs jenkins floci vs Pulumi floci vs argo-cd floci vs sops floci vs wtf floci vs dagger floci vs task floci vs aws-cdk floci vs infracost

Frequently asked questions

Is floci or webhook more popular?

floci has 24,500 GitHub stars and webhook has 12,134. floci has the larger community by that measure.

Are floci and webhook free?

Both are open source. floci is licensed under MIT and webhook under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between floci and webhook?

floci is written in Java and webhook in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, floci or webhook?

Choose floci if you want the larger community (24,500 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose webhook if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.