head to head · open source

Files vs xplorer

Files has 45,620 GitHub stars, 2,933 forks, 458 open issues and last shipped yesterday. xplorer has 5,674 stars, 379 forks, 49 open issues and last shipped 3 months ago. Files leads on adoption by 704% (45,620 vs 5,674 stars). Files is written in C# under MIT; xplorer is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0. Files has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, xplorer 7%. Files was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 3 topic tags (file-manager, files, fluent-design), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Files ★ 46K xplorer ★ 5.7K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Files xplorer
GitHub stars ★ 46K ★ 5.7K
License MIT AGPL-3.0
Written in C# TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-22 2026-06-25
Forks ⑂ 2.9K ⑂ 379
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Files if

  • You weight community size — 46K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches C#
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Files profile →

pick xplorer if

  • You want the xplorer feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and xplorer fits your workflow better

full xplorer profile →

About Files

Files is a modern, MIT licensed file manager for Windows, written in C and maintained by an open source community, for Windows users who want a customizable, actively developed alternative for organising files and folders.

read the full Files overview →

About xplorer

Xplorer is a cross platform, AI integrated desktop file manager built as a Tauri 2 application with a Rust backend and a React frontend, aimed at developers, researchers, students, and power users who want more from their files than the manager their operating system ships with.

read the full xplorer overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 206K Excalidraw ★ 133K RustDesk ★ 124K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K OBS Studio ★ 77K

Related comparisons

localsend vs files localsend vs rclone localsend vs copyparty localsend vs yazi localsend vs spacedrive localsend vs nextcloud localsend vs uppy localsend vs cloudreve openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces

More File Management & Sync projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the File Management & Sync field.

Files vs LocalSend Files vs rclone Files vs copyparty Files vs yazi Files vs Spacedrive Files vs Nextcloud Files vs uppy Files vs cloudreve Files vs superfile Files vs ranger Files vs Seafile Files vs PairDrop

Frequently asked questions

Is Files or xplorer more popular?

Files has 45,620 GitHub stars and xplorer has 5,674. Files has the larger community by that measure.

Are Files and xplorer free?

Both are open source. Files is licensed under MIT and xplorer under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Files and xplorer?

Files is written in C# and xplorer in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Files or xplorer?

Choose Files if you want the larger community (45,620 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose xplorer if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.