head to head · open source

Files vs ranger

Files has 45,547 GitHub stars, 2,920 forks, 458 open issues and last shipped today. ranger has 17,405 stars, 942 forks, 896 open issues and last shipped 11 days ago. Files leads on adoption by 162% (45,547 vs 17,405 stars). Files is written in C# under MIT; ranger is written in Python under GPL-3.0. Files has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, ranger 5%. Files was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (file-manager), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Files ★ 46K ranger ★ 17K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

Files ranger
GitHub stars ★ 46K ★ 17K
License MIT GPL-3.0
Written in C# Python
Last push 2026-09-20 2026-09-09
Forks ⑂ 2.9K ⑂ 942
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Files if

  • You weight community size — 46K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches C#
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Files profile →

pick ranger if

  • You want the ranger feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and ranger fits your workflow better

full ranger profile →

About Files

Files is a modern, MIT licensed file manager for Windows, written in C and maintained by an open source community, for Windows users who want a customizable, actively developed alternative for organising files and folders.

read the full Files overview →

About ranger

Ranger is a console file manager with VI key bindings, written in Python and released under the GNU General Public License version 3, for terminal users who want to browse, preview, and manipulate files without leaving a Unix shell.

read the full ranger overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K Browser Use ★ 115K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K

Related comparisons

localsend vs spacedrive localsend vs nextcloud localsend vs seafile localsend vs pairdrop localsend vs opencloud localsend vs owncloud localsend vs sync-in localsend vs hoodik openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces

More File Management & Sync projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the File Management & Sync field.

Files vs LocalSend Files vs rclone Files vs copyparty Files vs yazi Files vs Spacedrive Files vs Nextcloud Files vs uppy Files vs cloudreve Files vs superfile Files vs Seafile Files vs PairDrop Files vs dufs

Frequently asked questions

Is Files or ranger more popular?

Files has 45,547 GitHub stars and ranger has 17,405. Files has the larger community by that measure.

Are Files and ranger free?

Both are open source. Files is licensed under MIT and ranger under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Files and ranger?

Files is written in C# and ranger in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Files or ranger?

Choose Files if you want the larger community (45,547 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose ranger if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.