head to head · open source

Files vs cloudreve

Files has 45,518 GitHub stars, 2,918 forks, 458 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. cloudreve has 28,727 stars, 3,892 forks, 147 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Files leads on adoption by 58% (45,518 vs 28,727 stars). Files is written in C# under MIT; cloudreve is written in Go under GPL-3.0. Files has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, cloudreve 14%. cloudreve was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (file-manager), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Files ★ 46K cloudreve ★ 29K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

Files cloudreve
GitHub stars ★ 46K ★ 29K
License MIT GPL-3.0
Written in C# Go
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 2.9K ⑂ 3.9K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Files if

  • You weight community size — 46K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches C#
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Files profile →

pick cloudreve if

  • You want the cloudreve feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and cloudreve fits your workflow better

full cloudreve profile →

About Files

Files is a modern, MIT licensed file manager for Windows, written in C and maintained by an open source community, for Windows users who want a customizable, actively developed alternative for organising files and folders.

read the full Files overview →

About cloudreve

Cloudreve is a self hosted file management and sharing system written in Go that gives an organisation its own web file manager, sharing layer, and multi cloud storage gateway running on infrastructure it controls.

read the full cloudreve overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K Browser Use ★ 115K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K

Related comparisons

localsend vs spacedrive localsend vs nextcloud localsend vs seafile localsend vs pairdrop localsend vs opencloud localsend vs owncloud localsend vs sync-in localsend vs hoodik openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces

More File Management & Sync projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the File Management & Sync field.

Files vs LocalSend Files vs rclone Files vs copyparty Files vs yazi Files vs Spacedrive Files vs Nextcloud Files vs uppy Files vs Seafile Files vs PairDrop Files vs dufs Files vs OpenCloud Files vs cyberduck

Frequently asked questions

Is Files or cloudreve more popular?

Files has 45,518 GitHub stars and cloudreve has 28,727. Files has the larger community by that measure.

Are Files and cloudreve free?

Both are open source. Files is licensed under MIT and cloudreve under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Files and cloudreve?

Files is written in C# and cloudreve in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Files or cloudreve?

Choose Files if you want the larger community (45,518 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose cloudreve if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.