head to head · open source

Files vs uppy

Files has 45,518 GitHub stars, 2,918 forks, 458 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. uppy has 30,984 stars, 2,103 forks, 186 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Files leads on adoption by 47% (45,518 vs 30,984 stars). Files is written in C# under MIT; uppy is written in TypeScript under MIT. Files has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, uppy 7%. uppy was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (files), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Files ★ 46K uppy ★ 31K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

Files uppy
GitHub stars ★ 46K ★ 31K
License MIT MIT
Written in C# TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 2.9K ⑂ 2.1K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Files if

  • You weight community size — 46K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches C#
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Files profile →

pick uppy if

  • You want the uppy feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and uppy fits your workflow better

full uppy profile →

About Files

Files is a modern, MIT licensed file manager for Windows, written in C and maintained by an open source community, for Windows users who want a customizable, actively developed alternative for organising files and folders.

read the full Files overview →

About uppy

Uppy is an MIT licensed, TypeScript built, modular JavaScript file uploader for web browsers that drops into any web application, aimed at developers who would rather wire up plugins than build file uploading from scratch.

read the full uppy overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K Browser Use ★ 115K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K

Related comparisons

localsend vs spacedrive localsend vs nextcloud localsend vs seafile localsend vs pairdrop localsend vs opencloud localsend vs owncloud localsend vs sync-in localsend vs hoodik openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces

More File Management & Sync projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the File Management & Sync field.

Files vs LocalSend Files vs rclone Files vs copyparty Files vs yazi Files vs Spacedrive Files vs Nextcloud Files vs cloudreve Files vs Seafile Files vs PairDrop Files vs dufs Files vs OpenCloud Files vs cyberduck

Frequently asked questions

Is Files or uppy more popular?

Files has 45,518 GitHub stars and uppy has 30,984. Files has the larger community by that measure.

Are Files and uppy free?

Both are open source. Files is licensed under MIT and uppy under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Files and uppy?

Files is written in C# and uppy in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Files or uppy?

Choose Files if you want the larger community (45,518 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose uppy if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.