head to head · open source

Files vs syncthing-macos

Files has 45,602 GitHub stars, 2,931 forks, 458 open issues and last shipped today. syncthing-macos has 3,933 stars, 202 forks, 45 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. Files leads on adoption by 1,059% (45,602 vs 3,933 stars). Files is written in C# under MIT; syncthing-macos is written in Objective-C under MIT. Files has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, syncthing-macos 5%. Files was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Files ★ 46K syncthing-macos ★ 3.9K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Files syncthing-macos
GitHub stars ★ 46K ★ 3.9K
License MIT MIT
Written in C# Objective-C
Last push 2026-09-22 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 2.9K ⑂ 202
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Files if

  • You weight community size — 46K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches C#
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Files profile →

pick syncthing-macos if

  • You want the syncthing-macos feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Objective-C
  • You evaluated both and syncthing-macos fits your workflow better

full syncthing-macos profile →

About Files

Files is a modern, MIT licensed file manager for Windows, written in C and maintained by an open source community, for Windows users who want a customizable, actively developed alternative for organising files and folders.

read the full Files overview →

About syncthing-macos

Syncthing for macOS is the official frugal, native macOS tray application bundle for Syncthing, aimed at Mac users who want peer to peer file synchronisation to behave like a native application instead of a command line utility with a web browser interface.

read the full syncthing-macos overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 206K Excalidraw ★ 133K RustDesk ★ 124K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K OBS Studio ★ 77K

Related comparisons

localsend vs files localsend vs rclone localsend vs copyparty localsend vs yazi localsend vs spacedrive localsend vs nextcloud localsend vs uppy localsend vs cloudreve openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces

More File Management & Sync projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the File Management & Sync field.

Files vs LocalSend Files vs rclone Files vs copyparty Files vs yazi Files vs Spacedrive Files vs Nextcloud Files vs uppy Files vs cloudreve Files vs superfile Files vs ranger Files vs Seafile Files vs PairDrop

Frequently asked questions

Is Files or syncthing-macos more popular?

Files has 45,602 GitHub stars and syncthing-macos has 3,933. Files has the larger community by that measure.

Are Files and syncthing-macos free?

Both are open source. Files is licensed under MIT and syncthing-macos under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Files and syncthing-macos?

Files is written in C# and syncthing-macos in Objective-C. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Files or syncthing-macos?

Choose Files if you want the larger community (45,602 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose syncthing-macos if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.